Trident 509-02-72IRecalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Hemispherical Shell · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Trident (160)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07613327025231), received between Mar 29, 2021 and Mar 29, 2021 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
Patient problems
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 29, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PATIENT ARRIVED AT (B)(6), AHEAD OF THEIR TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT, BUT COMPLAINED TO DR OF A SORE HIP. PATIENT WAS X-RAYED, WHICH SHOWED THE CUP HAD COME AWAY FROM THE ACETABULUM. PATIENT SAID THEY HAD LENT FORWARD AND FELT PAIN IN THEIR HIP. DR SCHEDULED THEM FOR A REVISION ACETABULUM; INSTEAD OF THE TKR THEY WERE INITIALLY BOOKED FOR. DR CONTACTED ME AND ASKED ME TO ARRANGE REVISION CUP ITEMS; HE THOUGHT IT WAS A DEPUY CUP IN SITU. ON (B)(6), JUST PRIOR TO STARTING THE OPERATION; DR SAID IT WAS A TRITANIUM CUP. WHICH HAD BEEN DONE AS A REVISION SHELL IN (B)(6) 2020. DR SAID PATIENT HAD RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND ALSO A METABOLIC BONE DISEASE, THAT MADE THE BONE INCREDIBLY DENSE AND WAS SIMILAR TO OSTEOGENESIS PETROSIS. DR SAID THIS WAS EVIDENT BY THE LACK OF BONE GROWTH ON THE SHELL, WHEN IT WAS EXPLANTED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 11581018 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page