Skip to content

Trident 69-2248Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Constrained Acetabular Insert · Class 2 · Implant

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327025460), received between Apr 1, 2019 and May 27, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jul 30, 2026Open, Classified

    Affected devices were manufactured with Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) raw material aged in excess of five years. Product has the potential for elevated levels of oxidation, which may result in increased wear, leading to hazards such as excessive wear debris, material fragments, fractured device, or disassociated device. Potential harms include revision surgery, pain, and inflammation.

    Z-3201-2026 · Root cause: Process change control · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Off-Label Use1

Patient problems

  • Fall1
  • Injury1
  • Joint Dislocation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 27, 2026Off-Label Use; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION OF A COMPETITOR FEMORAL HEAD FROM A STRYKER CONSTRAINED LINER. THE CONSTRAINED LINER WAS REVISED USING ANOTHER CONSTRAINED LINER. REP HAS CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 25305018 ↗
  • InjuryApr 1, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION OF A TRIDENT ALL POLY CUP DUE TO DISLOCATION OF THE UHR HEAD FROM WITHIN THE CUP. PATIENT HAD A FALL PRIOR TO THE DISLOCATION.

    Patient problems: Fall; Injury

    MAUDE report 8470313 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices

All Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.