Skip to content

Trident 69-2850Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Constrained Acetabular Insert · Class 2 · Implant

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
11
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
11
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327025477), received between Jul 3, 2018 and May 27, 2026 — classified as 11 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (9 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jul 30, 2026Open, Classified

    Affected devices were manufactured with Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) raw material aged in excess of five years. Product has the potential for elevated levels of oxidation, which may result in increased wear, leading to hazards such as excessive wear debris, material fragments, fractured device, or disassociated device. Potential harms include revision surgery, pain, and inflammation.

    Z-3201-2026 · Root cause: Process change control · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated9
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Injury8
  • Joint Dislocation5
  • Pain2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 27, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: PT. PRESENTED WITH AN INFECTION OF THE RIGHT-HIP FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION OF A CEMENTED TRIDENT ALL-POLY LINER AND COMPETITOR TOTAL-FEMUR CONSTRUCT. DR. OPTED TO PERFORM AN EXTENSIVE I&D AND REVISE TO AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER OF SORTS. THE EXPLANTED TRIDENT ALL-POLY WAS REVISED WITH THE SAME SIZE LINER FOR THIS SURGERY. SCREWS WERE USED AS "REBAR, TO HELP GIVE THE LINER MORE SUPPORT WITHIN THE CEMENT-MANTLE BENEATH/BEHIND IT." NO COMPLAINTS WERE FILED AGAINST THE COMPONENTS THEMSELVES, NO FURTHER INFO AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25305677 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED: "THE BIPOLAR LINER IN THE CEMENTED ALL POLY CONSTRAINT CUP DISLOCATED. REVISION SURGERY HAD TO BE PERFORMED."

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties

    MAUDE report 21102577 ↗
  • InjuryNov 7, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AS REPORTED: "REV RTHA. SHE IS CHRONIC DISLOCATOR AND THE DOCTOR DECIDED TO GO WITH A COMPETITOR." REP CONFIRMED THE INNER BIPOLAR HEAD OF THE CONSTRAINED INSERT DISSOCIATED FROM THE OUTER POLY. REP ALSO CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 20628527 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 13, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A TRIDENT CEMENTED CONSTRAINED LINER IMPLANTED DURING A REVISION SURGERY. AFTER THE REDUCTION OF THE HIP, THE INNER PART OF THE CONSTRAINED LINER + THE FEMORAL HEAD DISASSOCIATED FROM THE EXTERNAL PART OF THE LINER, WHICH STAYED IN THE PATIENT (SINCE IT WAS CEMENTED IN THE SOCKET). IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO PERFORM THE REDUCTION AGAIN, SO THE SURGEON PROCEED TO EXTRACT THE LINER, WHICH CAME OUT TOGETHER WITH THE CEMENT MANTLE AND THE ANTERIOR WALL OF THE ACETABULUM OF THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 9708838 ↗
  • InjuryOct 14, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    DISLOCATION OF TRIDENT ALL-POLY CEMENTED CUP.

    Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 9186297 ↗
  • InjuryAug 21, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THIS PATIENT DISLOCATED AGAIN ON THE WARD ON THE 22ND. AGAIN THE CONSTRAINED ACETABULAR LINER APPEARED DISASSOCIATED ON X-RAY. A REVISION HIP WAS PERFORMED TODAY (THE LAST REVISION PERFORMED BY A (PREVIOUS DOCTOR AND HE IS ON ANNUAL LEAVE). THE DEVICE WAS REASSEMBLED (PUSHING THE LARGE BALL PAST THE RETAINING RING TO RELOCATE INTO THE LINER). A FORM OF DACRON SLING WAS USED TO PREVENT END OF RANGE IMPINGEMENT OF THE HIP STEM NECK ON THE CONSTRAINED LINER. THE DR. HAS ALLOWED PLAIN X-RAYS AND INTRO- OPERATIVE PICTURES TO BE SENT BUT THE OPERATIVE NOTES ARE NOT AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 8917326 ↗
  • InjuryJul 30, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    DISLOCATION LEFT PROSTHETIC HIP REPLACEMENT. CONSTRAINED CEMENTED LINER IN SITU. REVISION HIP SURGERY (B)(6). APPARENT DISLOCATION AND DISSOCIATION OF STRYKER CEMENTED CONSTRAINED LINER (LARGE ARTICULATING HEAD WITH OUTER CASING). LINER WAS REVISED WITH A NEW DEVICE OF THE SAME CATEGORY NUMBER. THE FEMORAL STEM WAS REVISED FOR ACETABULAR ACCESS. PRIMARY HIP SURGERY APPROXIMATELY 4 WEEKS AGO. CUSTOM HEMIPELVIC TUMOUR PROSTHESIS WITH STRYKER ALL POLY CONSTRAINED LINER 50MM, EXETER 44 NO 0 HIP STEM AND 28 + 0 HEAD. THE EXACT ITEM AND LOT CODES ARE NOT YET AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 8841778 ↗
  • InjuryApr 23, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED. AS REPORTED: "PRE-OP DIAGNOSIS: RIGHT FAILED HIP. SURGEON COMMENTS: STEM IS LOOSE, THIGH PAIN. PRE-OP NOTES: PATIENT HAS INCREASED PAIN, INCREASED DISABILITY WITH AMBULATION". A COMPETITOR STEM AND HEAD, AND A STRYKER LINER WERE REVISED. REP PROVIDED A PRE-REVISION X-RAY AND REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 8540664 ↗
  • InjuryApr 17, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    PATIENT CAME TO DOCTOR AND COMPLAIN ABOUT FEELING PAIN WHILE WALKING, AFTER X-RAY FOUND THAT TRIDENT V40 HEAD DISLOCATION.

    Patient problems: Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 8522651 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE PATIENT HAD REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT FAILED WHILE THE PATIENT LAY IN BED AND TURNED OVER. THE REP CONFIRMED THAT THE PATIENT¿S TOTAL FEMUR WAS EXTENDED BY 15MM. THIS INDICATED THAT THERE COULD HAVE BEEN SOFT TISSUE LAXITY/STRETCHING. THE REP UNDERSTANDS THAT THE INNER HEAD AND LOCKING RING DISLOCATED FROM THE CUP BODY.

    Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 7659712 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE PATIENT HAD SURGERY. THE REP UNDERSTANDS THAT THE INNER HEAD AND LOCKING RING HAS DISLOCATED FROM THE CUP BODY. THE PATIENT HAD A REVISION.

    Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 7659393 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices

All Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.