Skip to content

Trident 690-00-32HRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Constrained Acetabular Insert · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Trident (160)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327025569), received between Sep 28, 2018 and Jul 26, 2024 — classified as 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Injury2
  • Joint Dislocation2
  • Arthritis1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Pain1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY LEFT THA OUT OF CORS SCOPE. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT HAS A PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION AND IS ENTERED INTO CORS WITH A PROXIMAL FEMORAL REPLACEMENT. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED AGAIN INFECTION OF THE LEFT HIP AND UNDERWENT REVISION FOR PJI WITH ONLY THE MDM & HEAD COMPONENTS EXCHANGED ON (B)(6) 2022. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT DEVELOPS PJI AGAIN AND A REVISION IS PERFORMED, WITH CONSTRAINED LINER, HEAD (AND TAPER SLEEVE), AND PROXIMAL GMRS COMPONENTS EXCHANGED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19838979 ↗
  • InjuryMay 10, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    CONSTRAINED LINER DISLOCATION TYPE III OR IV ON (B)(6). REVISION DONE (B)(6). SWITCHED OUT FOR MODULAR DUAL MOBILITY.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 14350120 ↗
  • InjuryNov 18, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. EXAMINATION NOTES PROVIDED BY THE REP INDICATE THE FOLLOWING: "EXCRUCIATING PAIN IN THE HIP REGION WHEN HE TRIES TO STAND FROM A SEATED POSITION AND PARTICULARLY WHEN HE TRIES TO GET IN AND OUT OF A CAR¿BEGAN EXPERIENCING PAIN IN THE LEFT FOOT...I THINK HE IS DEVELOPING IMPINGEMENT CREATING A POLYETHYLENE SYNOVITIS..." A 32 +0 BIOLOX C-TAPER HEAD AND SLEEVE, AND SIZE H TRIDENT CONSTRAINED LINER WERE REVISED TO A 28 +0 BIOLOX C-TAPER HEAD AND 28MM SIZE H CONSTRAINED LINER. REP PROVIDED OPERATIVE REPORTS, USAGE SHEETS, EXAM NOTES, AND AN MRI REPORT AND REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Arthritis; Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 9335713 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 19, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    DURING THE COURSE OF A TOTAL HIP REIMPLANT PROCEDURE, DR (B)(6) CHOSE TO IMPLANT A CONSTRAINED ACETABULAR INSERT. DURING THE TRIAL RANGE OF MOTION EXERCISE, THE CONSTRAINED LINER DISASSOCIATED. THE METAL BIPOLAR PORTION CAME APART FROM THE POLY INSERT WHICH REMAINED FIRMLY IN THE SHELL. A SECOND IDENTICAL COMPONENT WAS THEN IMPLANTED UNEVENTFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8086742 ↗
  • InjurySep 28, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION.

    Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 7919443 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices

All Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page