Trident 690-00-32HRecalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Constrained Acetabular Insert · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Trident (160)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327025569), received between Sep 28, 2018 and Jul 26, 2024 — classified as 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- Injury2
- Joint Dislocation2
- Arthritis1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Pain1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY LEFT THA OUT OF CORS SCOPE. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT HAS A PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION AND IS ENTERED INTO CORS WITH A PROXIMAL FEMORAL REPLACEMENT. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED AGAIN INFECTION OF THE LEFT HIP AND UNDERWENT REVISION FOR PJI WITH ONLY THE MDM & HEAD COMPONENTS EXCHANGED ON (B)(6) 2022. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT DEVELOPS PJI AGAIN AND A REVISION IS PERFORMED, WITH CONSTRAINED LINER, HEAD (AND TAPER SLEEVE), AND PROXIMAL GMRS COMPONENTS EXCHANGED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 19838979 ↗InjuryMay 10, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
CONSTRAINED LINER DISLOCATION TYPE III OR IV ON (B)(6). REVISION DONE (B)(6). SWITCHED OUT FOR MODULAR DUAL MOBILITY.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 14350120 ↗InjuryNov 18, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. EXAMINATION NOTES PROVIDED BY THE REP INDICATE THE FOLLOWING: "EXCRUCIATING PAIN IN THE HIP REGION WHEN HE TRIES TO STAND FROM A SEATED POSITION AND PARTICULARLY WHEN HE TRIES TO GET IN AND OUT OF A CAR¿BEGAN EXPERIENCING PAIN IN THE LEFT FOOT...I THINK HE IS DEVELOPING IMPINGEMENT CREATING A POLYETHYLENE SYNOVITIS..." A 32 +0 BIOLOX C-TAPER HEAD AND SLEEVE, AND SIZE H TRIDENT CONSTRAINED LINER WERE REVISED TO A 28 +0 BIOLOX C-TAPER HEAD AND 28MM SIZE H CONSTRAINED LINER. REP PROVIDED OPERATIVE REPORTS, USAGE SHEETS, EXAM NOTES, AND AN MRI REPORT AND REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Arthritis; Injury; Pain
MAUDE report 9335713 ↗MalfunctionNov 19, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
DURING THE COURSE OF A TOTAL HIP REIMPLANT PROCEDURE, DR (B)(6) CHOSE TO IMPLANT A CONSTRAINED ACETABULAR INSERT. DURING THE TRIAL RANGE OF MOTION EXERCISE, THE CONSTRAINED LINER DISASSOCIATED. THE METAL BIPOLAR PORTION CAME APART FROM THE POLY INSERT WHICH REMAINED FIRMLY IN THE SHELL. A SECOND IDENTICAL COMPONENT WAS THEN IMPLANTED UNEVENTFULLY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8086742 ↗InjurySep 28, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION.
Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 7919443 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices
- Novation 134-36-45Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented Or Uncemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-28-650Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer89 reports
- Trident 690-00-28FHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall37 reports
- Trident 690-00-22EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall36 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-652Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer75 reports
- Trident 690-00-22DHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall22 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-654Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer70 reports
- Trident 69-2850Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall11 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page