Acetabular Insert 2099-2254Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Acetabular Insert · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Acetabular Insert (7)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327031461), received between Nov 20, 2018 and Oct 17, 2022 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- Joint Dislocation2
- Injury1
- Joint Laxity1
- Pain1
- Scarring1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 17, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD A LEFT HIP ACETABULAR REVISION DUE TO RECURRENT DISLOCATION/DISASSOCIATION.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 15613312 ↗InjurySep 3, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THIS PI IS FOR THE COMPLAINT OF ACHING AFTER REVISION. PATIENT'S DAUGHTER SUPPLIED OPERATIVE REPORTS, EXAM AND CLINIC NOTES, X-RAYS AND X-RAY REPORTS, AND A PATIENT LETTER ADDRESS TO STRYKER FOR A (B)(6) 2017 LEFT HIP REVISION AND A (B)(6) 2017 HIP REVISION. IN THE LETTER, DATED 14/JULY/2019, THE PATIENT STATES "FOR A VERY LONG TIME THERE WAS A SORENESS IN THE AREA ALONG THE PATH IT [BROKEN RING OF CONSTRAINED LINER, PORTION MIGRATED FEMORALLY] HAD MOVED DOWN LEG. TODAY IT STILL ACHES A LOT. THE INCISION SCAR IS SO DEEP".
Patient problems: Pain; Scarring
MAUDE report 8955489 ↗InjuryNov 20, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
"EVENT: PATIENT'S CONSTRAINED LINER DISLOCATED. CONSTRAINED LINER/ SHELL WERE REMOVED AND CONSTRAINED LINER IMPLANTED". UPDATE 25/OCTOBER/2018: REP REPORTED THE FOLLOWING: THE BIPOLAR DISLOCATED OUT OF THE LINER. CONSTRAINED LINER WAS SECURELY LOCKED IN SHELL. NEW HEAD WAS IMPLANTED INCREASING LENGTH FROM +0 TO +8. SURGEON CHOSE TO REVISE SHELL TO NEW TRITANIUM REVISION SHELL. OLD SHELL CAME OUT EASILY. NO POSSIBLE CAUSES FOR DISLOCATION.
Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 8090185 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices
- Novation 134-36-45Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented Or Uncemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-28-650Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer89 reports
- Trident 690-00-28FHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall37 reports
- Trident 690-00-22EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall36 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-652Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer75 reports
- Trident 690-00-22DHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall22 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-654Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer70 reports
- Trident 69-2850Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall11 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page