Skip to content

Acetabular Insert 2099-2258Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Acetabular Insert · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Acetabular Insert (7)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327031492), received between Nov 30, 2022 and Nov 30, 2022 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2

Patient problems

  • Joint Dislocation2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 30, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THIS PI IS FOR REVISION OF THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP ON (B)(6) 2022. ORIGINALLY REPORTED: "DISLOCATIONS IN A PATIENT AFTER UNDERGOING TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY WITH STRYKER PRODUCTS." RECORDS AND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY LITIGATION COORDINATOR INDICATE THE FOLLOWING PATIENT HISTORY: PRIMARY LEFT HIP IMPLANTATION APPROXIMATELY (B)(6) /2010. REVISION ON (B)(6) 2011 WITH A HEAD AND LINER EXCHANGE. REVISION (B)(6) 2014 DUE TO DISLOCATION, LINER WAS EXCHANGED. REVISION (B)(6) 2022, A CONSTRAINED LINER WAS CEMENTED INTO THE PATIENT. REVISION (B)(6) 2022, ALL STRYKER COMPONENTS REMOVED AND A COMPETITOR HIP WAS IMPLANTED. PER THE LITIGATION COORDINATOR, THE PATIENT IS REFUSING TO PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BEYOND WHAT IS CURRENTLY PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 15885785 ↗
  • InjuryNov 30, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THIS PI IS FOR REVISION OF THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP ON (B)(6) 2014. ORIGINALLY REPORTED: "DISLOCATIONS IN A PATIENT AFTER UNDERGOING TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY WITH STRYKER PRODUCTS." RECORDS AND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY LITIGATION COORDINATOR INDICATE THE FOLLOWING PATIENT HISTORY: PRIMARY LEFT HIP IMPLANTATION APPROXIMATELY ON (B)(6) 2010. REVISION ON (B)(6) 2011 WITH A HEAD AND LINER EXCHANGE. REVISION 11/MAY/2014 DUE TO DISLOCATION, LINER WAS EXCHANGED. REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022, A CONSTRAINED LINER WAS CEMENTED INTO THE PATIENT. REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022, ALL STRYKER COMPONENTS REMOVED AND A COMPETITOR HIP WAS IMPLANTED. PER THE LITIGATION COORDINATOR, THE PATIENT IS REFUSING TO PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BEYOND WHAT IS CURRENTLY PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 15885773 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices

All Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page