Acetabular Insert 2099-2858Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Acetabular Insert · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Acetabular Insert (7)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327031584), received between Aug 16, 2018 and Jan 15, 2021 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Patient-Device Incompatibility1
Patient problems
- Joint Dislocation1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 15, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE SUBMISSION OF A REVISION USAGE SHEET THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION. COMPARING THE CURRENT AND PREVIOUS REVISION USAGE SHEETS, A CONSTRAINED LINER, FEMORAL HEAD, AND RESTORATION MODULAR PROXIMAL BODY WERE REVISED TO A RESTORATION MODULAR PROXIMAL BODY, CERAMIC V40 HEAD, AND CONSTRAINED LINER.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 11178324 ↗MalfunctionAug 16, 2018Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility
REP PROVIDED A USAGE SHEET WHICH SHOWED A SERIES II LINER AS WASTED. REP REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON HAD TRIED THAT LINER FIRST, BUT IT WASN'T STABLE. SURGEON THEN TRIED THE SECOND LINER ORIGINALLY REPORTED. A SCREW, ALSO WASTED, WAS ONLY USED TO REMOVE THE 2 REPORTED LINERS. UPDATE 26-JUL-2018: REP ADDRESSED THE REPORT OF THE SERIES II LINER BEING UNSTABLE: "THE INSTABILITY WAS RELATED TO THE ROM AND LIKELY ASSOCIATED TO THE PATIENTS SOFT TISSUE ANATOMY FROM REVISION SURGERY. IT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE IMPLANT". THE SERIES II IMPLANT WAS DISPOSED BY THE HOSPITAL.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7788317 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices
- Novation 134-36-45Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented Or Uncemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-28-650Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer89 reports
- Trident 690-00-28FHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall37 reports
- Trident 690-00-22EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall36 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-652Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer75 reports
- Trident 690-00-22DHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall22 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-654Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer70 reports
- Trident 69-2850Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall11 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page