Skip to content

Unitrax 6942-5-043Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Head Component · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327032376), received between Apr 16, 2019 and Oct 15, 2024 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jun 19, 2024Open, Classified

    Mislabeled: the size on the package label of the UNITRAX Endoprosthesis Head Component potentially may not match the device within the packaging. This product mix only involves the three (3) sizes (43mm, 42mm, and the 38mm)

    Z-2370-2024 · Root cause: Employee error · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2

Patient problems

  • Injury2
  • Pain1
  • Unspecified Infection1
  • Wound Dehiscence1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 15, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED: "PT. PRESENTED WITH A DRAINING SURGICAL WOUND FOLLOWING A RIGHT HEMI DONE "SOME TIME AGO." EXPLANTED ITEMS WERE IDENTIFIED BY VISIBLE-MARKINGS, STEM WAS LEFT IN-SITU." REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 20452841 ↗
  • InjuryJul 25, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISED A RIGHT HEMI HIP DUE TO INFECTION. HE REVISED TO A CEMENTED HEMI.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 17387107 ↗
  • InjurySep 17, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED: "PATIENT PRESENTED TO CLINIC WITH RIGHT HIP PAIN. DECISION WAS MADE TO REVISE MONOPOLAR TO TOTAL HIP. STEM NOT REVISED. NO DAMAGE VISUALIZED WITH EXPLANTS. EXPLANT NOT AVAILABLE SECONDARY TO PATIENTS REQUEST FOR IMPLANT. PATIENT FROM OUT OF STATE - NO PREVIOUS OPERATIVE REPORT AVAILABLE." REP PROVIDED A PRE-REVISION X-RAY AND CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 9079687 ↗
  • InjuryApr 16, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED BY REP: "HIP TOTAL ARTHROPLASTY REVISION - RIGHT. RIGHT HIP REVISION¿WITH ABDUCTOR REPAIR. PRE OP DIAGNOSIS: RIGHT HIP DEGENERATIVE JOINT DISEASE". A UNITRAX HEAD AND +0 SLEEVE WERE REVISED. REP CONFIRMED THE SIZE 6 ACCOLADE II STEM WAS NOT REVISED, AND REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON. (B)(6) 2019: AS PER PHONE CALL WITH THE SALES REP, THE PATIENT WAS CONVERTED TO A TOTAL HIP TO ADD ACETABULAR COMPONENTS DUE TO PROGRESSION OF THE PATIENT'S DEGENERATIVE JOINT DISEASE. THERE WAS NO ISSUES NOTED WITH THE EXPLANTED DEVICES DURING THE REVISION SURGERY. IT IS UNKNOWN AS TO WHY THE PATIENT'S ABDUCTOR NEEDED REPAIR.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 8517935 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal devices

All Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page