Skip to content

Unitrax 6942-5-046Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Head Component · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Unitrax (20)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327032406), received between Jan 8, 2021 and Nov 11, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unstable” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection2
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 11, 2024Unstable; Unstable

    PT. PRESENTED WITH "PAIN AND INSTABILITY" FOLLOWING A RIGHT HEMIARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6). DR. OPTED TO REVISE THE HEMI BUT UPON CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE HIP INTRA-OP NO ANATOMICAL OR FUNCTIONAL ISSUES COULD BE DETERMINED. DR. OPTED TO REVISE HER UNIPOLAR-CONSTRUCT TO A BIPOLAR-CONSTRUCT. STEM WAS LEFT IN-SITU. NO COMPLAINTS FILED AGAINST THE COMPONENTS THEMSELVES; NO FURTHER INFO AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 20651278 ↗
  • InjuryOct 31, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT UNIPOLAR HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION. A UNITRAX HEAD AND SLEEVE WERE REVISED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 15705261 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO SUSPECTED INFECTION. A SIZE 46 UNIPOLAR HEAD AND -4 SLEEVE WERE EXCHANGED FOR SAME-SIZE IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 11140703 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal devices

All Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page