Skip to content

Unitrax 6942-5-049Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Head Component · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327032437), received between Feb 13, 2019 and Aug 29, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Joint Dislocation2
  • Injury1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 29, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: AS REPORTED: "PATIENT DISLOCATED HER UNIPOLAR. SHE WAS REVISED TO A RESECTION ARTHROPLASTY WITH NO IMPLANTS (GIRDLESTONE). NO REP PRESENT. NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE IMPLANTS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE." RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 22926305 ↗
  • InjuryOct 21, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    REVISED A RIGHT HEMI HIP TO A TOTAL HIP WITH CONSTRAINED LINER DUE TO DISLOCATION. NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE IMPLANTS MADE. UPDATE 30/SEPTEMBER/2022 WG: SPOKE TO REP. REP CONFIRMED THAT THE ENDOPROSTHESIS HEAD CAME OUT OF THE PATIENT'S NATIVE ACETABULUM. REP RE-CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 15648770 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 13, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. PATIENT WAS CONVERTED FROM A HEMI TO A TOTAL HIP. THE BIPOLAR COMPONENT AND FEMORAL HEAD WERE REVISED, THE STEM WAS NOT. UPDATE 21/JANUARY/2019: REP PROVIDED PRIMARY AND REVISION IMPLANT SHEETS. A UNITRAX BIPOLAR COMPONENT AND C-TAPER NECK ADJUSTMENT SLEEVE WERE REVISED TO A BIOLOX 36 +7.5 HEAD. THE STEM WAS NOT REVISED AND NO STRYKER ACETABULAR DEVICES ARE LISTED ON THE REVISION IMPLANT SHEET.

    Patient problems: Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 8336280 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal devices

All Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page