Skip to content

Trident 621-10-28DRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 10 Degree Polyethylene Insert · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Trident (160)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327037746), received between Feb 27, 2019 and Nov 17, 2022 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Degraded1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Injury3
  • Joint Dislocation2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 17, 2022Degraded; Loss of Osseointegration; Degraded; Loss of Osseointegration

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SALES REP THAT THE SURGEON NOTIFY ON A POSSIBLE REMOVAL CASE DUE TO LOOSENING.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 15812798 ↗
  • InjuryApr 18, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THIS PI IS FOR REVISION 1 DONE ON (B)(6) 2015 PATIENT HAD A RIGHT HIP REPLACEMENT DONE ON (B)(6) 2014. PATIENT WAS REVISED 3 TIMES DUE TO INFECTION AND OTHER COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Injury; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8526905 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 27, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THIS PI IS FOR DISLOCATION AND CLOSED REDUCTION ON (B)(6) 2016. IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE FILING OF A LAWSUIT THAT ALLEGEDLY ON (B)(6) 2016 AND AGAIN ON (B)(6) 2016 THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED FOR DISLOCATIONS AND UNDERWENT CLOSED REDUCTIONS OF THE HIP. IT IS FURTHER ALLEGED ON (B)(6) 2017 LESS THAN TWO MONTHS AFTER THE LAST CLOSED REDUCTION SHE WAS BACK IN THE HOSPITAL BECAUSE OF A DISLOCATION AND PAIN. THE CUP AND LINER WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED.

    Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 8375257 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 27, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THIS PI IS FOR DISLOCATION AND CLOSED REDUCTION ON (B)(6) 2016. IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE FILING OF A LAWSUIT THAT ALLEGEDLY ON (B)(6) 2016 AND AGAIN ON (B)(6) 2016 THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED FOR DISLOCATIONS AND UNDERWENT CLOSED REDUCTIONS OF THE HIP. IT IS FURTHER ALLEGED ON (B)(6) 2017 LESS THAN TWO MONTHS AFTER THE LAST CLOSED REDUCTION SHE WAS BACK IN THE HOSPITAL BECAUSE OF A DISLOCATION AND PAIN. THE CUP AND LINER WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED.

    Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 8375142 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page