Trident 621-10-32ERecalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 10 Degree Polyethylene Insert · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Trident (160)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327037807), received between May 2, 2019 and Feb 24, 2020 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Degraded” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Degraded1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- Injury2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 24, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
(B)(6) 201, IT WAS CONFIRMED A ARMD (ADVERSE REACTIONS TO METAL DEBRIS). 2020/1/23 REVISION SURGERY DID. IT WAS NO TRANIONOSIS.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 9746615 ↗InjuryMay 2, 2019Degraded; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Material Deformation; Degraded; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISSOCIATION. BLACK TISSUE AND WEAR OF THE LINER WERE NOTED IN THE PATIENT. REP REPORTED THAT THERE WERE NO HIGH ION LEVELS. THERE WAS A REVISION OF SHELL, LINER, STEM, HEAD, AND SCREW. THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE SHELL. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO COMPETITOR DEVICES. REP REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 8574489 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page