Skip to content

Trident 623-00-32FRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 0 Degree Polyethylene Insert · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327039474), received between Jul 25, 2018 and Oct 21, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Fitting Problem1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 21, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    RE-OPERATION DUE TO DISLOCATION (REPLACEMENT OF LINER AND HEAD).

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23346238 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 9, 2020Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    THE DR TRIED TO LOCK THE 32MM F 0DEG HIP INSERT IN AND IT WOULDN¿T ¿LOCK¿. HE REMOVED IT TO MAKE SURE THE SCREW HEAD WAS DOWN IN THE CUP AND THAT THERE WAS NOT AND SOFT TISSUE KEEPING IT FROM LOCKING. HE REMOVED AND TRIED 3 TIMES. WE THEN OPENED A NEW F INSERT AND IT LOCKED IMMEDIATELY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10654905 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 20, 2018Fitting Problem; Fitting Problem

    AFTER IMPLANTING TRIDENT CUP INTO THE PATIENT, INSERT X3 LINER. THIS FAILS AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS AND IT IS BELIEVED THAT THE SIZE IS INCORRECT. ONE OPENS A NEW PACKAGE OF THE SAME SIZE AND FITS DIRECTLY. 5-10 MINUTES DELAY IN SURGERY DUE TO THIS FAILURE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8090376 ↗
  • InjuryJul 25, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE CUSTOMER QUERIED EXPIRY DATES OF 3 DEVICES WHICH HAD BEEN IMPLANTED INTO A PATIENT. THE PATIENT HAS EXPERIENCED AN UNSPECIFIED EVENT. UPDATE: THE CUSTOMER REPORTS THAT THE PATIENT'S JOINT IS INFECTED; THE CUSTOMER HAS REQUEST EXPIRE DATE OF THE DEVICES.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7718478 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page