Trident 623-10-32DRecalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 36 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327039849), received between Mar 6, 2017 and Jun 29, 2026 — classified as 25 injuries, 11 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (8 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 36 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryJun 29, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: "THE LAWYER HAS INDICATED THAT THERE WILL BE A PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIM, SO WE SHOULD ANTICIPATE NEEDING TO OPEN A PI IF WE HAVEN¿T ALREADY".

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 25650458 ↗
• InjuryOct 14, 2024Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  PT HAD A HEAD & LINER EXCHANGE PERFORMED FOR INFECTION. THE LINER REMOVED APPEARED DAMAGED ON THE RIM WHICH SURGEON SAID WAS NOT A RESULT OF THE REMOVAL.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 20447288 ↗
• InjuryJul 26, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  THIS PI IS FOR REVISION ON (B)(6) 2023. PATIENT HAD AN INDEX LEFT THA ON (B)(6) 2023. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH INSTABILITY AND DISLOCATED THE LEFT HIP ON (B)(6) 2023, UNDERWENT A CLOSED REDUCTION. ON (B)(6) 2023 THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH ANOTHER DISLOCATION EVENT, AND WAS REVISED, WITH HEAD AND LINER EXCHANGE ONLY. THE PATIENT HAS ANOTHER DISLOCATION EVENT AND IS REVISED AGAIN ON (B)(6) 2023. CUP, LINER, AND HEAD WERE EXCHANGED TO DUAL MOBILITY CONSTRUCT.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 19837098 ↗
• InjuryApr 25, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  PATIENT CALLED STRYKER STATING THAT SHE EXPERIENCED 2 DISLOCATIONS ON HER HIP AND PATIENT WANTS TO KNOW IF ANY DEVICES WERE RECALLED AND WHAT STRYKER WILL DO TO ASSIST WITH PAYMENT FOR REVISION SURGERY UPCOMING. UPDATE 07-MARCH-2019: IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE FILING OF A LAWSUIT THAT ALLEGEDLY THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN LFIT ANATOMIC COCR V40 FEMORAL HEAD ON HER RIGHT HIP ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2010 AND WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2015. IT IS FURTHER ALLEGED THAT SHE SUFFERED INJURIES AS A RESULT OF IMPLANTATION AND EXPLANTATION OF THE DEVICE AT ISSUE, AND DEVICE RECALL.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 19184815 ↗
• InjuryFeb 5, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  PERFORMED AN I&D WITH LINER AND HEAD EXCHANGE DUE TO MRSA INFECTION. HE DECIDED TO CHANGE FROM A 32 10 DEG LINER AND 32+8 METAL HEAD TO AN MDM WITH +8.

  Patient problems: Drug Resistant Bacterial Infection

  MAUDE report 18646657 ↗
• InjurySep 17, 2023Mechanical Problem; Malposition of Device; Mechanical Problem; Malposition of Device

  HIP REVISION FOR PERI-PROSTHETIC FRACTURE OF TRITANIUM/ACCOLADE 2 THR COMPLETED IN 2021. THE SURGEON ASSESSED THE ORIGINAL SHELL FIXATION AND LINER INTEGRITY. HE OBSERVED THE POLY LINER WAS HAVING INCREASED TRANSLATION WITHIN THE SHELL WITH MANUAL FORCE APPLIED. THE OLD POLY LINER WAS REMOVED AND A NEW REPLACEMENT LINER WAS INSERTED WHICH LOCKED IN SATISFACTORILY AND PROCEEDED TO CONTINUE ON WITH THE CASE.

  Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

  MAUDE report 17762395 ↗
• InjuryMar 8, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THIS REPORT IS FOR THE ALLLEGED I&D AND INSERT SWAP PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. AS REPORTED: "THIS I&D AND INSERT-SWAP WAS PERFORMED AGAIN TODAY, INVOLVING MORE EXTENSIVE DEBRIDEMENT THAN TUESDAY (B)(6), ALONG WITH PLACEMENT OF COMPETITOR ABSORBABLE ANTIBIOTIC BEADS (NOT OURS). NO NEW INFORMATION HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE." RIGHT HIP.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 13692292 ↗
• InjuryMar 4, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  AS REPORTED: "PT PRESENTED WITH SYMPTOMS OF AN INFECTION. I&D, POLY-SWAP, AND PLACEMENT OF ANTIBIOTIC BEADS. NO COMPLAINTS FILED AGAINST THE COMPONENTS THEMSELVES." SPOKE TO REP, WHO PROVIDED USAGE SHEETS FROM THE CURRENT AND PRIOR (REVISION OF COMPETITOR IMPLANTS) SURGERIES. REP CONFIRMED NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 13666145 ↗
• InjuryFeb 11, 2022Degraded; Material Discolored; Degraded; Material Discolored

  LEFT HIP WASHOUT AND HEAD AND LINER CHANGE SECONDARY TO INFECTION. DOCTOR NOTED SIGNS OF MECHANICAL WEAR/EARLY METALOSIS OF THE HEAD AND DISCOLOURATION OF THE POLY LINER.

  Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction; Metal Related Pathology; Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 13518845 ↗
• InjuryNov 8, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  PT REQUIRED THA REVISION FOR DISLOCATION. A CONSTRAINED LINER WAS IMPLANTED AND HEAD OFFSET WAS INCREASED BY 8MM.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 12766597 ↗
• InjurySep 7, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  IT HAS BEEN REPORTED "A TRIDENT PSL CUP AND LINER WAS INSERTED BY A SURGEON, THE LINER DISLODGED WHILE THE PATIENT WAS IN RECOVERY. THE PATIENT HAD TO GO IN FOR SURGERY AGAIN 5 DAYS LATER (13/8) FOR A REVISION TO REMOVE THE LINER AND REPLACE IT AND INSERT CORRECTLY. I SUSPECT IT WAS NOT IMPACTED CORRECTLY FOR THE LOCKING SCALLOPS TO ENGAGE BUT THE LINER HAD TO BE REVISED. THE CUP REMAINED". REVISION AND LINER CHANGE.

  Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 12436513 ↗
• InjuryJun 30, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO THE DRAINAGE OF PUS FROM THE INCISION. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT WITH A HEAD AND LINER EXCHANGE.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 12090775 ↗
• InjuryJun 14, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION. AS REPORTED BY REP: "PATIENT HAD A PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE, REVISED TO A REST MOD. SURGEON STATED THAT THE PATIENT SUBSEQUENTLY DEVELOPED MRSA INFECTION DUE TO A HOUSE PET. NO OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE DUE TO HOSPITAL POLICY." REP PROVIDED USAGE SHEETS AND X-RAYS. A HEAD AND LINER EXCHANGE WAS PERFORMED.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 11991151 ↗
• MalfunctionFeb 16, 2021Degraded; Difficult to Insert; Device-Device Incompatibility; Degraded; Difficult to Insert; Device-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED DURING A RIGHT PRIMARY HIP PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE DEVICE HAD THREE ADDITIONAL 'NODES' AROUND THE PERIPHERAL LOCKING MECHANISM PREVENTING IT FROM IMPACTING INTO THE SHELL. AFTER THE SURGEON CUT OFF ONE, THE OTHER TWO WERE FOUND AND THE DEVICE WAS WASTED. THERE WAS A 5 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY TO PROCURE A SECOND DEVICE.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 11333322 ↗
• InjuryDec 15, 2020Scratched Material; Scratched Material

  PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. PATIENT PRESENTED TO HAVE THEIR HIP REVISED AND SURGEON DECIDED TO REPLACE THE LINER AT THE SAME TIME AS THERE WERE OBVIOUS SCRATCH MARKS INSIDE THE LINER. SURGEON USED A DIFFERENT COMPANY FOR THE STEM FIXATION AND LEFT THE PSL CUP IN-SITU.

  Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

  MAUDE report 11010689 ↗
• InjurySep 15, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

  SUBJECT REPORTED MODERATE SHARP RIGHT GROIN PAIN. SHE HAS BEEN HAVING RIGHT HIP PAIN SINCE (B)(6) 2018. SHE CONTINUES TO HAVE PAIN AND WEAKNESS TO HER RIGHT LOWER EXTREMITY WITH ASSOCIATED THIGH PAIN. CURRENT AND PAST PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS REVEALED RIGHT ANTERIOR CAPSULE PAIN, TROCHANTERIC REGION. THE SUBJECT WAS REFERRED TO THE PI'S PARTNER IN (B)(6) 2018 FOR LOW BACK PAIN. SUBJECT HAD AN MRI OF HER LUMBAR SPINE, THE RESULTS REVEALED MILD LUMBAR SPONDYLOSIS WITH NEURAL FORAMINAL NARROWING AT L4-5; HOWEVER, IT DID NOT SUGGEST PROXIMAL RADICULOPATHY. THE DOCTOR WAS NOT ABLE TO RULE OUT SOME OTHER FORM OF NERVE ENTRAPMENT VERSUS RADICULITIS. IT'S POSSIBLE THE SUBJECT MAY BE HAVING REFERRED PAIN FROM HER ILIOPSOAS MUSCLE/BURSA. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE SUBJECT WAS GIVEN AN ULTRASOUND GUIDED INJECTION. SHE HAD ZERO RELIEF. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE SUBJECT HAD A FLUOROSCOPY DIRECTED RIGHT HIP ASPIRATION AND STEROID INJECTION. SHE HAD 3 DAYS OF PAIN RELIEF. SHE IS CURRENTLY ATTENDING PHYSICAL THERAPY.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 10536213 ↗
• InjurySep 15, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

  THIS PI IS FOR THE FLUOROSCOPY DIRECTED ASPIRATION OF THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP ON (B)(6) 2019. AS REPORTED: SUBJECT REPORTED MODERATE SHARP RIGHT GROIN PAIN. SHE HAS BEEN HAVING RIGHT HIP PAIN SINCE (B)(6) 2018. SHE CONTINUES TO HAVE PAIN AND WEAKNESS TO HER RIGHT LOWER EXTREMITY WITH ASSOCIATED THIGH PAIN. CURRENT AND PAST PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS REVEALED RIGHT ANTERIOR CAPSULE PAIN, TROCHANTERIC REGION. THE SUBJECT WAS REFERRED TO THE PI'S PARTNER IN (B)(6) 2018 FOR LOW BACK PAIN. SUBJECT HAD AN MRI OF HER LUMBAR SPINE, THE RESULTS REVEALED MILD LUMBAR SPONDYLOSIS WITH NEURAL FORAMINAL NARROWING AT L4-5; HOWEVER, IT DID NOT SUGGEST PROXIMAL RADICULOPATHY. THE DOCTOR WAS NOT ABLE TO RULE OUT SOME OTHER FORM OF NERVE ENTRAPMENT VERSUS RADICULITIS. IT'S POSSIBLE THE SUBJECT MAY BE HAVING REFERRED PAIN FROM HER ILIOPSOAS MUSCLE/BURSA. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE SUBJECT WAS GIVEN AN ULTRASOUND GUIDED INJECTION. SHE HAD ZERO RELIEF. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE SUBJECT HAD A FLUOROSCOPY DIRECTED RIGHT HIP ASPIRATION AND STEROID INJECTION. SHE HAD 3 DAYS OF PAIN RELIEF. SHE IS CURRENTLY ATTENDING PHYSICAL THERAPY.

  Patient problems: Muscle Weakness/Atrophy; Pain

  MAUDE report 10534601 ↗
• InjurySep 15, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

  PATIENT'S DAUGHTER STATED HER MOTHER HAS BEEN EXPERIENCING EXCRUCIATING PAIN, ROM, VERTIGO SYMPTOMS AND OFF BALANCE SINCE HER RIGHT THA THAT WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2015. PATIENT WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THE IMPLANTS ARE PART OF A RECALL.

  Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Loss of Range of Motion; Pain; Vertigo

  MAUDE report 10533719 ↗
• MalfunctionMar 2, 2020Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

  CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT MR. WAS UNDERTAKING A TRIDENT ACCOLADE THR ON TUESDAY (B)(6) 2020 WHEN THEY ATTEMPTED TO IMPLANT THE LINER BUT IT WOULD NOT SEAT PROPERLY. IT ALLEGEDLY APPEARED TOO LARGE FOR THE SHELL. CUSTOMER SAID, AFTER CHECKING THE ITEM IN THE BOX, THEY CAN CONFIRM THAT IT IS STAMPED WITH THE SAME INFORMATION AS ON THE OUTER BOX. CUSTOMER THEN OPENED ANOTHER BOX OF THE SAME SIZE, IT FITTED CORRECTLY AND THE OPERATION WAS COMPLETED. THE IMPLANT IN THE TWO BOXES WERE VISIBLY OF DIFFERENT SIZES. UPDATE: "THE SCRUB NURSE BELIEVES THERE WAS APPROXIMATELY A 5-10 MINUTE DELAY WHILST THE INSERT WAS CHECKED AND AN ALTERNATIVE ONE WAS OBTAINED FROM THE STOREROOM."

  Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

  MAUDE report 9775737 ↗
• InjuryFeb 26, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED. AS REPORTED BY REP: "PATIENT REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION." SPOKE TO REP. THE FEMORAL HEAD CAME OUT OF THE POLY LINER. THE HEAD AND LINER WERE REVISED. THE SHELL AND 2 SCREWS WERE ALSO REVISED TO CHANGE THE SHELL'S POSITIONING. REP PROVIDED PRIMARY AND REVISION USAGE SHEETS AND A POST-REVISION X-RAY AND CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE AVAILABLE.

  Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 9753326 ↗
• InjuryOct 17, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION (INFECTION REPORTED BY SURGEON. UNKNOWN IF CLINICALLY CONFIRMED OR IDENTIFIED). ALL HIP IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED AND AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER PLACED. REP PROVIDED THE PRIMARY USAGE SHEET AND REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE AVAILABLE.

  Patient problems: Injury; Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 9202066 ↗
• InjuryOct 16, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Osseointegration Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Osseointegration Problem

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY UNDERTOOK A REVISION OF AN ACETABULAR CUP THAT HAD MOVED IN SITU. UPDATE: PATIENT WAS WALKING UP STAIRS AND FELT SOMETHING GIVE IN LEFT HIP + PAIN. ADMITTED TO A&E ON (B)(6) 2019 AND THEN REFERRED TO CONSULTANT. X RAYS SHOWED THE CUP HAD MOVED. THESE HAD BEEN IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2019, WHICH WAS A 1ST REVISION DUE TO AN ACETABULAR FRACTURE. THE FRACTURE WAS PLATED AT THE SAME TIME. 19-SEPT-2019 AR. UPDATE BASED ON CLINICIAN REVIEW OF THE CASE: "DISLOCATION OF THE LEFT HIP AND APPROXIMATELY A 90°. MIGRATION OF THE ACETABULAR COMPONENT WITHIN THE HOST PELVIS."

  Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury; Joint Dislocation; Pain

  MAUDE report 9197237 ↗
• InjuryAug 23, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Insufficient Device Problem Information

  "ON (B)(6) 2016" "THERE IS AN X-RAY OF THE RIGHT HIP, LABELED "POST-DISLOCATION", AND APPARENTLY A CLOSED REDUCTION WITH SEDATION WAS PERFORMED AND UNCOMPLICATED REDUCTION WAS DESCRIBED"

  Patient problems: Fall; Injury; Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 8925230 ↗
• InjuryMay 1, 2019Unstable; Unstable

  POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: THE PATIENT UNDERWENT RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY (B)(6) 2011 (OUTSIDE CORS SCOPE). THEN PATIENT UNDERWENT RIGHT TOTAL HIP REVISION (B)(6) 2013. NOW THE PATIENT HAD A SECOND RIGHT TOTAL HIP REVISION FOR INSTABILITY WITH INSERTION OF MDM IN (B)(6) 2018.

  Patient problems: Injury

  MAUDE report 8569579 ↗
• InjuryJan 22, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

  PATIENT HAD OCCASIONAL MILD TROCHANTERIC PAIN ON THE LEFT. A VISIT OF (B)(6) 2014 WAS FOR MEDICAL FOLLOW-UP AND DESCRIBES A RECENT ONSET OF LEFT HIP PAIN.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 8269043 ↗