Skip to content

Tritanium 500-03-48CRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Hemispherical Solid Back Shell · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Tritanium (18)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327039993), received between Mar 15, 2021 and Jun 26, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of Osseointegration2
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration2
  • Pain2
  • Osteolysis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 26, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE PRIMARY SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. ON (B)(6), 2025, THE REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED BECAUSE OSTEOLYSIS WAS OBSERVED APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR AFTER THE INITIAL SURGERY, AND THE PATIENT REPORTED PAIN DUE TO LOOSENING OF THE CUP. THE SURGEON HAS USED HA EXTENSIVELY IN THE PAST BUT USED THIS PRODUCT BECAUSE THE PATIENT IN THIS CASE WAS ALLERGIC TO SILVER.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 22334907 ↗
  • InjuryOct 23, 2023Migration; Migration

    ON (B)(6), 2017, PRIMARY THA SURGERY WAS PERFORMED AND THE TRITANIUM CUP WAS IMPLANTED IN THE LEFT HIP OF THE FEMALE PATIENT. ON (B)(6), 2023, CENTRAL MIGRATION WAS CONFIRMED. THE CUP WAS ABOUT TO GO THROUGH THE INNER PLATE OF THE HIP JOINT AND THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF PAIN.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 17983422 ↗
  • InjuryMar 15, 2021Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    IT WAS REPORTED BY PATIENT'S COUNSEL THAT ALLEGEDLY THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A TRITANIUM ACETABULAR CUP ON (B)(6) 2016 AND WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2020 DUE TO ALLEGED CUP LOOSENING.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 11490247 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page