Skip to content

Tritanium 500-03-58FRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Hemispherical Solid Back Shell · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Tritanium (18)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327040050), received between Aug 14, 2017 and Jun 3, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of Osseointegration4
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration3
  • Pain2
  • Injury1
  • Joint Dislocation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 3, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE SITE NOTIFIED STRYKER ON (B)(6) 2025 THAT DR. ASSESSED THIS SUBJECT'S CLINIC NOTES AND CONFIRMED THERE WAS A LOOSENING OF THE CUP. PERSISTENT NON-UNION FRACTURE (B)(6) 2017 OF THE POSTERIOR COLUMN WITH RADIOLUCENCY OF THE ACETABULUM.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 22131166 ↗
  • InjuryApr 29, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT HAD A HIP CUP REVISION DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 19202138 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 8, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED. AS REPORTED: "REVISION OF RIGHT TOTAL HIP. PATIENT IS DISLOCATING." A SHELL, HEAD, AND LINER WERE REVISED.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 16330556 ↗
  • InjuryJan 2, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    AS REPORTED: "PT REPORTED LEFT POSTERIOR HIP PAIN. ONSET OF PAIN WAS GRADUAL AND THEN WORSENED WITH PROLONGED ACTIVITY AND WEIGHT BEARING. X-RAYS REVEALED PROGRESSIVE LUCENCY. BONE SCAN REVEALED INCREASED UPTAKE AROUND THE ACETABULUM. ON (B)(6) 2018 SUBJECT RETURNED TO CLINIC FOR A FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT WITH PI. SUBJECT REPORTED HE IS 6-WEEKS POST-OP CONTRALATERAL (R) THA AND AFTER COMPLETING PHYSICAL THERAPY FOR CONTRALATERAL THA, SUBJECT REPORTS STUDY HIP (L) PAIN HAS MOSTLY SUBSIDED. PI WILL SEE SUBJECT FOR FOLLOW-UP (L) THA ASSESSMENT ON (B)(6) 2019. PI DEEMED THIS ADVERSE EVENT AS 'UNCERTAIN' REGARDING STUDY DEVICE RELATIONSHIP".

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 8210389 ↗
  • InjuryAug 14, 2017Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN AND A LOOSE CUP. EXPLANTED DEVICES WERE TRITANIUM CUP, LINER, HEAD.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 6793427 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page