Tritanium PL 48950116Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · Posterior Lumbar Cage · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327117356), received between Aug 28, 2017 and Feb 4, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration6
- Fracture3
- Break1
- Microbial Contamination of Device1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- Neuropathy2
- Injury1
- Insufficient Information1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 4, 2025Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS A TRITANIUM PL CAGE AND AN ES2 SCREW THAT MIGRATED POST-OPERATIVELY. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT TWO ADDITIONAL ES2 SCREWS MIGRATED POST-OPERATIVELY. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS WORKING IN THE FIELDS ONE MONTH POST-OPERATIVELY. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE CAGE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21306620 ↗InjuryNov 21, 2024Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WITH NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 2.5 YEARS POST-OPERATIVELY TO ADDRESS TWO MIGRATED TRITANIUM POSTERIOR LUMBAR CAGES THAT WERE IN CONTACT WITH A NERVE. UPON CAGE REMOVAL DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE CAGES FRACTURED INTRA-OPERATIVELY (ADDRESSED IN PI (B)(4)). THE FRACTURED COMPONENTS OF THE CAGES WERE EXPLANTED, HOWEVER THE REST OF THE CAGES REMAINED IMPLANTED. THE CAGE SURFACES WERE SMOOTHED AND DECOMPRESSION WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED TO ALLEVIATE THE NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE SECOND OF THE TWO MIGRATED CAGES.
Patient problems: Neuropathy
MAUDE report 20748582 ↗InjuryNov 21, 2024Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WITH NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 2.5 YEARS POST-OPERATIVELY TO ADDRESS TWO MIGRATED TRITANIUM POSTERIOR LUMBAR CAGES THAT WERE IN CONTACT WITH A NERVE. UPON CAGE REMOVAL DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE CAGES FRACTURED INTRA-OPERATIVELY (ADDRESSED IN PI (B)(6)). THE FRACTURED COMPONENTS OF THE CAGES WERE EXPLANTED, HOWEVER THE REST OF THE CAGES REMAINED IMPLANTED. THE CAGE SURFACES WERE SMOOTHED AND DECOMPRESSION WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED TO ALLEVIATE THE NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE FIRST OF THE TWO MIGRATED CAGES.
Patient problems: Neuropathy
MAUDE report 20748443 ↗MalfunctionNov 21, 2024Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WITH NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 2.5 YEARS POST-OPERATIVELY TO ADDRESS TWO MIGRATED TRITANIUM POSTERIOR LUMBAR CAGES (ADDRESSED IN PI (B)(6)). WHILE ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE TWO LUMBAR CAGES WITH AN AVS SPACER INSERTER, BOTH CAGES FRACTURED AND THE INSERTER DEFORMED INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE FRACTURED COMPONENTS OF THE CAGES WERE EXPLANTED, HOWEVER THE REST OF THE CAGES REMAINED IMPLANTED. THE CAGE SURFACES WERE SMOOTHED AND DECOMPRESSION WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED TO ALLEVIATE THE NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE SECOND OF TWO LUMBAR CAGES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20747670 ↗MalfunctionNov 21, 2024Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WITH NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 2.5 YEARS POST-OPERATIVELY TO ADDRESS TWO MIGRATED TRITANIUM POSTERIOR LUMBAR CAGES (ADDRESSED IN (B)(6)). WHILE ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE TWO LUMBAR CAGES WITH AN AVS SPACER INSERTER, BOTH CAGES FRACTURED AND THE INSERTER DEFORMED INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE FRACTURED COMPONENTS OF THE CAGES WERE EXPLANTED, HOWEVER THE REST OF THE CAGES REMAINED IMPLANTED. THE CAGE SURFACES WERE SMOOTHED AND DECOMPRESSION WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED TO ALLEVIATE THE NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE FIRST OF TWO LUMBAR CAGES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20747618 ↗MalfunctionJul 1, 2020Microbial Contamination of Device; Migration; Microbial Contamination of Device; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO TRITANIUM PL CAGES MIGRATED POST-OPERATIVELY. THE PATIENT IS ASYMPTOMATIC, THEREFORE NO REVISION SURGERY HAS BEEN SCHEDULED. THIS REPORT REPRESENTS THE FIRST OF THE TWO CAGES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10218089 ↗MalfunctionJul 1, 2020Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO TRITANIUM PL CAGES MIGRATED POST-OPERATIVELY. THE PATIENT IS ASYMPTOMATIC, THEREFORE NO REVISION SURGERY HAS BEEN SCHEDULED. THIS REPORT REPRESENTS THE SECOND OF THE TWO CAGES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10217977 ↗InjuryJun 6, 2019Migration; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ONE OF THE TWO CAGES MIGRATED POST-OPERATIVELY. PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 8674331 ↗MalfunctionAug 28, 2017Fracture; Break; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; UPON ROTATING CAGE THE CAGE BROKE IN HALF ALMOST AT THE MIDLINE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6824483 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page