Skip to content

Tritanium PL 48953090Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · Posterior Lumbar Cage · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Tritanium PL (45)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327117851), received between Nov 14, 2016 and Jul 11, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 2 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture5
  • Break3
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Material Integrity Problem1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Migration1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1
  • Split1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient5
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Injury1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 11, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY TO REMOVE A TRITANIUM PL CAGE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22481574 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A TRITANIUM PL CAGE FRACTURED INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE FRACTURED COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT, RESULTING IN A 30-60 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22475056 ↗
  • InjuryJun 6, 2018Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT 2 SCREWS PULLED OUT OF VERTEBRAL BODY AND INTERBODY CAGE MIGRATED FROM ORIGINAL POSITION. PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Injury

    MAUDE report 7573021 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 2, 2018Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A CAGE APPEARED FRACTURED IN A FOLLOW-UP X-RAY. THE PATIENT HAD A L5-S1 FUSION ON (B)(6) 2016 AND IMAGES LOOKED NORMAL ON SEVERAL FOLLOW UP APPOINTMENTS. THE SURGEON SAID THAT THE PATIENT IS NOT SYMPTOMATIC.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7390489 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 13, 2018Fracture; Split; Fracture

    AFTER A CAGE WAS INSERTED (L5-S1), FINAL X-RAY INDICATED THE CAGE SPLIT. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE POSTERIOR PORTION OF THE CAGE, LEAVING ANTERIOR PORTION IN THE DISC SPACE. ALL FRAGMENTS WERE SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED AND THERE WERE NO DELAYS OR ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7266684 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 5, 2017Break; Material Integrity Problem; Material Twisted/Bent; Break; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT; UPON IMPLANTING AN INTERBODY DEVICE THE CAGE BECAME TWISTED. THE SURGEON NOTICED IT, REMOVED THE IMPLANT AND A NEW CAGE WAS USED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6460971 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 20, 2017Break; Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT; THE CAGE BROKE DURING INSERTION AND POSITIONING OF CAGE. THE CORRECT INSERTER (SIZE 11) WAS ALLEGEDLY THREADED ONTO CAGE AND IMPLANTED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED DELAYS OR ADVERSE EVENT OCCURRED DURING SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6344242 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 14, 2016Fracture; Break; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT; WHILE ATTEMPTING TO INSERT A CAGE, THE CAGE BROKE INTO SEVERAL PIECES.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6100929 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page