Tritanium PL 48953090Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · Posterior Lumbar Cage · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Tritanium PL (45)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327117851), received between Nov 14, 2016 and Jul 11, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture5
- Break3
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Material Integrity Problem1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
- Migration1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
- Split1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient5
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Injury1
- Insufficient Information1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 11, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY TO REMOVE A TRITANIUM PL CAGE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 22481574 ↗MalfunctionJul 10, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A TRITANIUM PL CAGE FRACTURED INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE FRACTURED COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT, RESULTING IN A 30-60 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22475056 ↗InjuryJun 6, 2018Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 2 SCREWS PULLED OUT OF VERTEBRAL BODY AND INTERBODY CAGE MIGRATED FROM ORIGINAL POSITION. PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Injury
MAUDE report 7573021 ↗MalfunctionApr 2, 2018Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A CAGE APPEARED FRACTURED IN A FOLLOW-UP X-RAY. THE PATIENT HAD A L5-S1 FUSION ON (B)(6) 2016 AND IMAGES LOOKED NORMAL ON SEVERAL FOLLOW UP APPOINTMENTS. THE SURGEON SAID THAT THE PATIENT IS NOT SYMPTOMATIC.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7390489 ↗MalfunctionFeb 13, 2018Fracture; Split; Fracture
AFTER A CAGE WAS INSERTED (L5-S1), FINAL X-RAY INDICATED THE CAGE SPLIT. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE POSTERIOR PORTION OF THE CAGE, LEAVING ANTERIOR PORTION IN THE DISC SPACE. ALL FRAGMENTS WERE SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED AND THERE WERE NO DELAYS OR ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7266684 ↗MalfunctionApr 5, 2017Break; Material Integrity Problem; Material Twisted/Bent; Break; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; UPON IMPLANTING AN INTERBODY DEVICE THE CAGE BECAME TWISTED. THE SURGEON NOTICED IT, REMOVED THE IMPLANT AND A NEW CAGE WAS USED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Code Available; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6460971 ↗MalfunctionFeb 20, 2017Break; Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; THE CAGE BROKE DURING INSERTION AND POSITIONING OF CAGE. THE CORRECT INSERTER (SIZE 11) WAS ALLEGEDLY THREADED ONTO CAGE AND IMPLANTED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED DELAYS OR ADVERSE EVENT OCCURRED DURING SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6344242 ↗MalfunctionNov 14, 2016Fracture; Break; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; WHILE ATTEMPTING TO INSERT A CAGE, THE CAGE BROKE INTO SEVERAL PIECES.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6100929 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page