Aero-C 48892050Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · Cervical Cage · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Aero-C (8)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327124675), received between Aug 7, 2017 and Mar 14, 2020 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Problem” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Mechanical Problem2
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Failure to Advance1
- Material Deformation1
- Separation Problem1
- Unintended Movement1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Injury1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 14, 2020Material Deformation; Separation Problem; Material Deformation; Separation Problem
STRYKER REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT WHEN THE SURGEON MALLETED AN AERO-C CAGE 5MM INTERBODY DEVICE, 12DX14W PARALLEL INTO THE DISC SPACE, THE BLADES WERE OUTSIDE OF THE IMPLANT AND THE IMPLANT BENT. SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH A TWO HOUR DELAY.
Patient problems: Injury; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9832644 ↗MalfunctionOct 30, 2017Mechanical Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unintended Movement; Mechanical Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; THE CUTTER WOULD NOT PENETRATE BONE. IN RESPONSE THE CAGE KEPT GETTING FORCED OUT OF THE DISC SPACE
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6989415 ↗MalfunctionAug 7, 2017Detachment Of Device Component; Mechanical Problem; Detachment Of Device Component; Mechanical Problem; Failure to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; ANCHOR WOULD NOT FULLY INSERT INTO CAGE. BOTH THE GUIDED AND FREEHAND TAMPS WERE IMPACTED FORCEFULLY AGAINST THE PARTIALLY INSERTED ANCHOR, BUT THE ANCHOR WOULD NOT PROGRESS FURTHER. THE END OF THE ANCHOR REMAINS PROUD BY APPROXIMATELY 1-2MM. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY OF 5 MINUTES ASSOCIATED WITH SEVERAL ATTEMPTS TO IMPACT THE ANCHOR USING BOTH TYPES OF TAMPS IN THE SET. THE SURGEON ULTIMATELY DECIDED TO LEAVE THE CAGE WITH THE ANCHOR REMAINING PROUD. FLUOROSCOPIC IMAGE OF IMPLANTED CAGE AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6772610 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, cervical devices
- EIT CIF cage CUI8070SEIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical1 recall4 reports
- ROI-C MC1005TLDR Spine Usa, Inc. · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical54 reports
- EIT CIF cage CUI8060LEIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical1 recall1 report
- CONSTRUX - MINI PTC 37-5012SPOrthofix US LLC · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, cervical1 recall0 reports
- CONSTRUX - MINI Ti 37-6211SPOrthofix US LLC · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, cervical1 recall0 reports
- CONSTRUX - MINI Ti 37-7308SPOrthofix US LLC · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, cervical1 recall0 reports
- CONSTRUX - MINI Ti 37-9207SPOrthofix US LLC · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, cervical1 recall0 reports
- CONSTRUX - MINI Ti 37-6106SPOrthofix US LLC · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, cervical1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page