NA 5140-508-240Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG · C2 NerveMonitor, 4 Channel · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327177329), received between Aug 27, 2019 and Aug 27, 2019 — classified as 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Noise, Audible” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Noise, Audible6
- Failure to Sense2
- Device Displays Incorrect Message1
- No Device Output1
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient7
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 27, 2019Noise, Audible; Noise, Audible
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE THE MONITOR WAS BEEPING DUE TO INTERFERENCES DURING ELECTROCAUTERY, LASTING FOR A FEW MOMENTS AFTER CAUTERY HAD STOPPED. THIS CONDITION, IN WHICH THE DEVICE IS DELIVERING ADDITIONAL AUDIBLE INDICATION, MAY BE MISUNDERSTOOD BY THE USER, POSING INCREASED RISK OF NERVE INJURY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY, NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8934562 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2019Noise, Audible; Noise, Audible
DURING A PROCEDURE IN WHICH THE MONITOR WAS IN USE WITH A MUTE SENSOR, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH AUDIO FEEDBACK BEING MUTED. THIS CONDITION, IN WHICH THE DEVICE IS DELIVERING ADDITIONAL AUDIBLE INDICATION, MAY BE MISUNDERSTOOD BY THE USER, POSING INCREASED RISK OF NERVE INJURY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY, NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8934560 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2019Noise, Audible; Noise, Audible
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, AFTER THE USE OF ELECTROCAUTERY, THERE WAS ADDITIONAL, INCONSISTENT BEEPING FROM THE MONITOR. THIS CONDITION, IN WHICH THE DEVICE IS DELIVERING ADDITIONAL AUDIBLE INDICATION, MAY BE MISUNDERSTOOD BY THE USER, POSING INCREASED RISK OF NERVE INJURY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY, NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8934550 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2019Noise, Audible; Noise, Audible
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TYMPANOMASTOIDECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE MONITOR WAS BEEPING AFTER THE USE OF ELECTROCAUTERY. THIS CONDITION, IN WHICH THE DEVICE IS DELIVERING ADDITIONAL AUDIBLE INDICATION, MAY BE MISUNDERSTOOD BY THE USER, POSING INCREASED RISK OF NERVE INJURY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY, NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8934549 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2019Failure to Sense; Device Displays Incorrect Message; Noise, Audible; Failure to Sense; Device Displays Incorrect Message; Noise, Audible
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILE ELECTROCAUTERY WAS IN USE DURING A PROCEDURE, THE MONITOR WAS EXCESSIVELY BEEPING, DISPLAYED A DIALOG BOX ON THE SCREEN WHEN THE STIMULATION PROBE WAS NOT IN USE, AND HAD AN INTERMITTENT LOSS OF RECORDING CHANNEL, WHICH WOULD RETURN WHEN ELECTROCAUTERY ENDED. THESE CONDITIONS, IN WHICH THE DEVICE IS DELIVERING ADDITIONAL AUDIBLE INDICATION OR HAS AN INACCURATE VISIBLE DISPLAY, MAY BE MISUNDERSTOOD BY THE USER, POSING INCREASED RISK OF NERVE INJURY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY, NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8934548 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2019No Device Output; Use of Device Problem; No Device Output; Use of Device Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE IN A PROCEDURE, THE MONITOR WAS NOT PROVIDING AUDITORY INDICATION, BECAUSE A USER HAD ACCIDENTLY BUMPED A CONTROL KNOB AND TURNED OFF THE STIMULATION ENERGY. THIS CONDITION, IN WHICH THE DEVICE DOES NOT DELIVERY ENERGY, MAY BE INTERPRETED BY THE USER AS A FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT, POSING INCREASED RISK OF NERVE INJURY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY, NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8934534 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2019Failure to Sense; Noise, Audible; Failure to Sense; Noise, Audible
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE AT THE USER FACILITY, THE MONITOR EXPERIENCED A LOSS OF THE NERVE CONFIRMATION TONE, PROVIDING ONLY ARTIFACT NOISE. THIS CONDITION, IN WHICH THE ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT IS INCOMPLETE, MAY RESULT IN THE LOSS OF NERVE MONITORING RECORDING FUNCTION, POSING INCREASED RISK OF NERVE INJURY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY, NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION, AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8934533 ↗
Other STIMULATOR, NERVE devices
- NIM Vital NIM4CM01Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE2 recalls260 reports
- NIM TriVantage® 8229707Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE2 recalls176 reports
- NIM® 8229306Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE1 recall1 death167 reports
- NIM Vital™ NIM4CPB1Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE3 recalls45 reports
- NIM Trivantage® 8229707Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE1 recall142 reports
- NIM® 8229307Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE1 recall138 reports
- NIM TriVantage® 8229706Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE2 recalls78 reports
- NIM-Response® 8253002Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE171 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page