Skip to content

Trident X3 Insert 723-00-32BRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Trident X3 0 Degree Polyethylene Insert · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Trident X3 Insert (22)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327297058), received between Aug 10, 2021 and Nov 11, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Joint Dislocation1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Wound Dehiscence1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 11, 2025Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: THIS PI IS FOR THE REVISION OF A STRYKER CONSTRUCT DUE TO DISLOCATION AND HIP INSTABILITY. AS PER PSS IMPLANT REQUEST CASE (B)(4): COMPLEX ORTHOPAEDIC HISTORY, INCLUDING PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE OF DISTAL FEMUR, REQUIRING NAIL-PLATE FIXATION, THEN AN INTERTROCHANTERIC FEMUR FRACTURE, TREATED WITH SLIDING HIP SCREW AND THAT WENT ON TO NONUNION. NOW SHE IS S/P CONVERSION THA WITH A GT NONUNION, AND A 44 TRIDENT CUP, AND A RESTORATION MODULAR STEM. SHE HAS DISLOCATED IN HER FIRST WEEK POSTOPERATIVELY. REVISION SURGERY IS SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2025.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 23529225 ↗
  • InjuryAug 10, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO WOUND DRAINAGE. INITIALLY, THE SURGEON SUSPECTED THERE WAS A SUPERFICIAL ABSCESS. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE WOUND WAS NOT FULLY CLOSED DOWN TO THE JOINT. A STRYKER LINER AND COMPETITOR HEAD WERE REVISED. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 12299336 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page