Trident II 7030-6530Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 6.5MM LOW PROFILE HEX SCREW 30MM · Class 2 · Implant
All models of TRIDENT II (42)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327345063), received between Jan 10, 2018 and May 9, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture3
- Malposition of Device2
- Break1
- Device Damaged by Another Device1
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
- Loss of Osseointegration1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 9, 2024Fracture; Fracture
SURGEON STATED THAT THE SCREW HEAD SPLIT IN HALF BEFORE FULL SEATING. RESULTED IN HAVING TO USE A METAL CUTTING BURR TO FLATTEN DOWN HEAD IN ORDER TO INSERT THE LINER. ADDITIONAL INFO.: 4/30/2024 - LEFT OR RIGHT SIDE: LEFT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19282660 ↗InjuryAug 12, 2021Fracture; Loss of Osseointegration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Fracture; Loss of Osseointegration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
AS REPORTED: "REVISED HIP FOR LOOSE CUP. PATIENT CAME WITH LOOSE CUP AND PAIN." PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED. A SHELL, MDM METAL LINER, ADM/ MDM POLY INSERT, AND 2 SCREWS WERE REVISED. REP PROVIDED AN OPERATIVE REPORT FROM THE PRIOR IMPLANTATION AND AN X-RAY. UPDATE 20/JULY/2021 WG: SPOKE TO REP. THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED MDM METAL LINER OR ADM/ MDM POLY INSERT. THE SHELL HAD SHIFTED THROUGH THE PATIENT'S PELVIS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain
MAUDE report 12311974 ↗MalfunctionDec 11, 2020Device Damaged by Another Device; Device Damaged by Another Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW PENETRATED THROUGH THE ACETABULAR SHELL DURING SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10990221 ↗MalfunctionMay 23, 2019Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
SURGEON NOTIFIED REP THAT X-RAYS 1 WEEK POST OP SHOW A SCREW PASSED COMPLETELY THROUGH THE ACETABULAR SHELL IN THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP. IT IS NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME OF REPORT IF THE SCREW WAS IMPLANTED THAT WAY. THE SURGEON HAS NOT REPORTED A PLAN TO REVISE THE PATIENT AT THE TIME OF REPORT. UPDATE 20 MAY, 2019: MEDICAL REVIEW CONFIRMED THE EVENT AND CONFIRMED MALPOSITION OF THE SCREW AS A ROOT CAUSE OF THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8637436 ↗MalfunctionMay 23, 2019Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
SURGEON NOTIFIED REP THAT X-RAYS 1 MONTH POST OP SHOW A SCREW PASSED COMPLETELY THROUGH THE ACETABULAR SHELL IN THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP. IT IS NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME OF REPORT IF THE SCREW WAS IMPLANTED THAT WAY. THE SURGEON HAS NOT REPORTED A PLAN TO REVISE THE PATIENT AT THE TIME OF REPORT. UPDATE 20 MAY, 2019: MED REVIEW CONFIRMED THE EVENT AND ALSO IDENTIFIED SCREW AND SHELL MALPOSITION AND CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8637434 ↗MalfunctionJan 10, 2018Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
ACETABULAR SCREW FRACTURE IDENTIFIED AT THE 2 WEEK FOLLOW UP VISIT IN DOCTOR'S OFFICE WHEN RADIOLOGY FILMS WERE OBTAINED. PATIENT HAD NO COMPLAINTS AND WAS THEREFORE PLACED ON 20% PARTIAL NON-WEIGHT BEARING RESTRICTIONS. HARDWARE EXAMINED AS STABLE AND WELL SEATED. SUBSEQUENT VISITS .
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7179839 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices
- Novation 134-36-45Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented Or Uncemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-28-650Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer89 reports
- Trident 690-00-28FHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall37 reports
- Trident 690-00-22EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall36 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-652Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer75 reports
- Trident 690-00-22DHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall22 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-654Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer70 reports
- Trident 69-2850Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall11 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page