Surpass Evolve FDS40025Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · Flow Diverter System · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Surpass Evolve (22)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327375213), received between May 7, 2022 and Feb 10, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
Patient problems
- Headache1
- Stenosis1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 10, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT FLOW DIVERTER STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE RIGHT ICA TO TREAT A PARAOPHTALMIC ANEURYSM IN A PATIENT. THE SUBJECT STENT PLAYED SHORT AND LANDED WITH A LEDGE AND THEREFORE A SECOND STENT WAS TELESCOPED TO LAND WELL IN THE HORIZONTAL CAVERNOUS. UPON SIX MONTH POST PROCEDURE FOLLOW-UP THE DISTAL SEGMENT OF THE SUBJECT STENT (FIRST STENT) SHOWED STENOSIS (DISTAL TO DISTAL END OF SECOND FLOW DIVERTER STENT). NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Stenosis
MAUDE report 16355429 ↗InjuryMay 7, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT IN THE CLINICAL TRIAL THE SUBJECT FLOW DIVERTER WAS IMPLANTED IN A PATIENT FOR TREATMENT OF ANEURYSM IN LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY-CAVERNOUS (C4 SEGMENT) ON (B)(6) 2021 WHICH COMPLETELY COVERED THE ANEURYSM NECK. POST PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 THE PATIENT HAD A MIGRAINE HEADACHE WHERE THE HEADACHE WAS TYPICALLY SLOW IN ONSET ALONG WITH DIZZINESS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS TYPICAL HEADACHE WAS CONSISTENT WITH PRE-TREATMENT MIGRAINE SYMPTOMS IN THE PATIENT. AS PER SITE REPORTING THE PATIENT WAS PRESCRIBED BENADRYL 25MG ONCE IV, REGLAN 5MG ONCE IV, AND HALDOL 2.5MG ONCE IV. THE PATIENT RECOVERED FROM MIGRAINE HEADACHE ON (B)(6) 2021. CT DIAGNOSTIC TESTS PERFORMED CAME BACK NEGATIVE. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE IMR (DESIGNATED CEC MEMBER) HAS ASSESSED THE MIGRAINE HEADACHE IN THE PATIENT HAD POSSIBLE RELATION TO THE SUBJECT FLOW DIVERTER AND AN UNDERLYING CONDITION OR DISEASE. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Headache
MAUDE report 14319598 ↗
Other Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices
- Pipeline TM Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology TM PED2-300-12Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter2 recalls1 report
- PIPELINE PED-500-20Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall31 reports
- PIPELINE PED-500-35Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall1 death29 reports
- PIPELINE PED-500-16Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall2 deaths27 reports
- PIPELINE PED-500-25Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall1 death23 reports
- PIPELINE PED-500-30Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall21 reports
- PIPELINE PED-450-25Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall20 reports
- PIPELINE PED-475-30Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall1 death19 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page