Skip to content

Surpass Evolve FDS50030Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · Flow Diverter System · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Surpass Evolve (22)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327375312), received between Apr 20, 2022 and Apr 8, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deformation Due to Compressive Stress” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Difficult or Delayed Activation1
  • Premature Activation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Paresis1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 8, 2024Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE THERE WAS ¿FISH MOUTHED¿ ON THE PROXIMAL END OF THE SUBJECT STENT. PATIENTS RIGHT SIDE SHUT DOWN AND NOT DOING GREAT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE. UPDATE: RECEIVED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON 30-APR-2024 STATED THE ANATOMICAL LOCATION OF THE REPORTED ISSUE WAS RIGHT PROXIMAL PETROUS SEGNMENT AND THE PATIENT HAS SOME DEFICIT (VISION). IN THE PHYSICIAN¿S OPINION IT IS CONSIDERED AS A NEUROLOGIC DEFICIT AND THE ADVERSE EVENT IS RELATED TO THE REPORTED ISSUE OF 80% FISH MOUTHING OF PROXIMAL STENT. THERE WAS NO HYPERPLASIA OR THROMBOSIS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Paresis; Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 19067153 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 3, 2022Premature Activation; Premature Activation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSMAL FLOW DIVERTER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE IN THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY(ICA) , WHILE ADVANCEMENT OF THE FLOW DIVERTER STENT, PHYSICIAN FELT RESISTANCE INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER. EXACT LOCATION WHERE FLOW DIVERTER WAS STUCK WAS UNKNOWN. THE SUBJECT FLOW DIVERTING STENT WAS DEPLOYED PREMATURELY INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14598129 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 20, 2022Difficult or Delayed Activation; Difficult or Delayed Activation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE AT CAVERNOUS ICS THE STENT (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS NOT FULLY DEPLOYED BUT IT WAS OPPOSED DISTALLY AND NOT OPEN PROXIMALLY. THE STENT (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT SAFELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14162441 ↗

Other Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices

All Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page