Surpass Evolve FDS50040Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · Flow Diverter System · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Surpass Evolve (22)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327375329), received between Oct 10, 2020 and Jul 21, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Difficult to Remove2
- Difficult or Delayed Activation1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
- Thrombosis/Thrombus1
- Visual Impairment1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 21, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE THE SUBJECT FLOW DIVERTING STENT HAD TO BE LOADED AND UNLOADED TO GET THE PERFECT VESSEL WAS APPOSITION. PHYSICIAN USED A J - WIRE TO HELP MASSAGE THE SUBJECT FLOW DIVERTING STENT SO THAT IT CAN POP OFF THE PAD. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17371245 ↗MalfunctionJul 18, 2023Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE PROCEDURE WHILE MANIPULATING THE SUBJECT STENT FOR TREATMENT SITE PLACEMENT, IT WOULD NOT RE-CAPTURE INTO THE CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE CATHETER AND THE SUBJECT STENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17347346 ↗MalfunctionSep 8, 2021Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN DEPLOYING THE SUBJECT FLOW DIVERTER, BUT THE STENT WAS PLACED IN THE TARGET SITE SUCCESSFULLY. DURING RE-CROSSING RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN TRACKING THE CATHETER BACK OVER THE DELIVERY WIRE. UPON REMOVAL, THE RESHEATH PAD WAS FOUND IN THE DISTAL PETAL. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12437338 ↗MalfunctionJan 5, 2021Difficult to Remove; Difficult or Delayed Activation; Difficult to Remove; Difficult or Delayed Activation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE PHYSICIAN FACED RESISTANCE WHILE ADVANCING THE SUBJECT FLOW DIVERTING STENT THROUGH THE MICRO CATHETER AND FACED DIFFICULTY TO RE CAPTURE THE SUBJECT STENT INTO THE MICRO CATHETER AFTER PARTIAL DEPLOYMENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11118605 ↗InjuryOct 10, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD EXPERIENCED ACUTE CENTRAL RETINAL ARTERY THROMBOSIS APPROXIMATELY 32 HOURS POST DEPLOYMENT OF THE SUBJECT FLOW DIVERTER. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED ACUTE LOSS OF VISION IN IPSILATERAL EYE OF IMPLANTATION. THE SUBJECT FLOW DIVERTER WAS IMPLANTED IN THE CAVERNOUS SEGMENT OF THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA) AND NO DIFFICULTIES WERE ENCOUNTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. PATIENT RECEIVED 6MG OF IA TPA IN CAROTID AND EXTERNAL ARTERY AS A MEDICAL INTERVENTION TO TREAT THE THROMBOSIS AND LOSS OF VISION. THE VISION IMPROVED AFTER THE PATENT RECEIVED THE MEDICATION. 16 HOURS POST TPA PATIENT¿S SCAN SHOWED MANY MICROHEMORRHAGES AND MEDICAL MANAGEMENT WAS USED TO FOLLOWING INDICATION OF HEMORRHAGES. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Thrombosis/Thrombus; Visual Impairment
MAUDE report 10659909 ↗
Other Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices
- Pipeline TM Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology TM PED2-300-12Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter2 recalls1 report
- PIPELINE PED-500-20Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall31 reports
- PIPELINE PED-500-35Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall1 death29 reports
- PIPELINE PED-500-16Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall2 deaths27 reports
- PIPELINE PED-500-25Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall1 death23 reports
- PIPELINE PED-500-30Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall21 reports
- PIPELINE PED-450-25Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall20 reports
- PIPELINE PED-475-30Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter1 recall1 death19 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page