Skip to content

TRIDENT II 702-11-52ERecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Trident II Clusterhole HA Acetabular shell 52E · Class 2 · Implant

All models of TRIDENT II (42)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327380859), received between Feb 6, 2020 and Aug 18, 2021 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Damaged by Another Device” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Feb 27, 2024Class IIOpen, Classified

    The acetabular shell may have excessive deburring, resulting in a smooth surface on the edge of the shell

    Z-1624-2024 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Damaged by Another Device1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Injury1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 18, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO FAILURE OF THE SHELL TO INGROW. THE SHELL, HEAD, AND LINER WERE REVISED. REP CONFIRMED THAT THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE HEAD AND LINER, AND THE STEM WAS RETAINED. REP ALSO CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 12336356 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 11, 2020Device Damaged by Another Device; Device Damaged by Another Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW PENETRATED THROUGH THE ACETABULAR SHELL DURING SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10991525 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2020Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    DR. REVISED A RIGHT TOTAL HIP THAT WAS ORIGINALLY DONE ON (B)(6) 2019. PATIENT HAD DISLOCATED MULTIPLE TIMES. DR/ FELT THE CUP WAS PLACED TOO VERTICALLY AND THE STEM WAS UNDERSIZED. HE REVISED THE ENTIRE HIP TO A TRIDENT II MULTI-HOLE CUP, MDM AND OMNIFIT HFX PRESS FIT STEM. UPDATE 13/JANUARY/2020: SPOKE TO REP. SURGEON ALSO FELT THAT THE IMPLANTED STEM WAS UNDERSIZED FOR THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY AND WAS REVISED.

    Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 9678668 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page