TRIDENT II 702-11-58FRecalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Trident II Clusterhole HA Acetabular shell 58F · Class 2 · Implant
All models of TRIDENT II (42)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07613327380958), received between Jul 8, 2021 and Jul 8, 2021 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Malposition of Device” (1 report).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Recalls naming this device
- Feb 27, 2024Class IIOpen, Classified
The acetabular shell may have excessive deburring, resulting in a smooth surface on the edge of the shell
Z-1626-2024 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Malposition of Device1
Patient problems
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 8, 2021Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED. THE STEM IMPLANTED 2 DAYS PRIOR TO THE REVISION WAS TOO SMALL FOR THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY AND SUBSIDED SOMEWHAT. THE SHELL WAS IMPLANTED IN TOO VERTICAL A POSITION AND NEEDED ITS POSITION ALTERED. A LARGER STEM AND (DUE TO NEEDING TO RE-REAM TO RE-POSITION THE SHELL) LARGER SHELL WERE IMPLANTED. REP CONFIRMED THERE WERE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED HEAD AND LINER.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties
MAUDE report 12133393 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page