TRIDENT II 702-11-56FRecalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Trident II Clusterhole HA Acetabular shell 56F · Class 2 · Implant
All models of TRIDENT II (42)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07613327380972), received between Jun 18, 2019 and Jun 18, 2019 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 18, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
PRIMARY PROCEDURE, LEFT HIP, PATIENT'S BONE QUALITY REPORTED AS POOR, ANTERIOR APPROACH AT MEDIUM ANGLE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW PASSED THROUGH THE SHELL. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE SCREW WENT THROUGH A SCREW HOLE OR THE DOME HOLE. ALSO, WHEN TRYING TO IMPLANT THE DOME HOLE PLUG, THE SURGEON COULD NOT GET AN OPTIMAL ANGLE FOR IMPLANTATION AND STRIPPED THE THREADS OF THE PLUG. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND NOT REPLACED. REP CONFIRMED SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO DELAY AND THAT THE SURGEON DOES NOT PLAN TO PERFORM A REVISION. REP ALSO PROVIDED THE IMPLANT SHEET AND A POST-OP X-RAY AND REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8707624 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices
- Novation 134-36-45Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented Or Uncemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-28-650Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer89 reports
- Trident 690-00-28FHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall37 reports
- Trident 690-00-22EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall36 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-652Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer75 reports
- Trident 690-00-22DHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall22 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-654Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer70 reports
- Trident 69-2850Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall11 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page