Skip to content

Surpass Elite FDSE45015Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · Flow Diverter System · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Surpass Elite (17)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327582888), received between Dec 12, 2025 and Mar 30, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation Failure1
  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Malposition of Device1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Thrombosis/Thrombus1
  • Unintended Radiation Exposure1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Malposition of Device; Activation Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED SOME RIBBONING AROUND THE GENU AND WERE ABLE TO WORK OUT THE RIBBON AFTER AWHILE WHICH LED THE PHYSICIAN TO FEEL COMFORTABLE TO DEPLOY THE SUBJECT STENT. ONCE DEPLOYED, THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THE SUBJECT STENT DID NOT OPEN MUCH MORE THAN IT SHOWED AROUND THE ANTERIOR GENU. THE SUBJECT STENT WAS TWISTED/TORQUED. ONCE THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO GET THROUGH THE TWISTED PART OF THE SUBJECT STENT, THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO DEPLOY A RETRIEVER AND WAS ABLE TO OPEN THE DEVICE ENOUGH TO HELP GET A BALLOON CATHETER THROUGH. THE PHYSICIAN THEN INFLATED THE BALLOON AND THE STENT FINALLY OPENED. THERE WAS SURGICAL DELAY OF 1.5HRS DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24728842 ↗
  • InjuryDec 12, 2025Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS USED IN THE MEDICAL PROCEDURE. HOWEVER, AFTER DEPLOYMENT OF THE STENT THE PROXIMAL SECTION OF THE STENT FISH MOUTHED. THE PHYSICIAN USED DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES USING BALLOON, MICROCATHETER TO OPEN THE STENT, HOWEVER ENDED UP BY IMPLANTING ANOTHER SNARE STENT TO OPEN THE PROXIMAL SECTION OF THE SUBJECT STENT. THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED FORMATION OF CLOT NEAR THE STENT THUS ADDITIONAL MEDICATIONS WERE PROVIDED TO THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS DELAYED FOR SEVERAL HOURS, AND THE PATIENT WAS KEPT ON ADDITIONAL RADIATION TIME. THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE COMPLETED, AND THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE WELL.

    Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus; Unintended Radiation Exposure

    MAUDE report 23790429 ↗

Other Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices

All Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page