Skip to content

Surpass Elite FDSE50040Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · Flow Diverter System · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Surpass Elite (17)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327583151), received between Oct 14, 2024 and Feb 17, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Malposition of Device1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 17, 2026Difficult to Remove

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ANEURYSM TREATMENT PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT STENT WOULD NOT RESHEATH DESPITE MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS WITH MICROCATHETER. PHYSICIAN EVENTUALLY GAVE UP ON RESHEATHING AND DEPLOYED THE STENT. THERE WAS NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24361529 ↗
  • InjuryOct 14, 2024Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE ANEURYSM PROCEDURE IN THE VERTEBROBASILAR ARTERY THE SUBJECT FLOW DIVERTER EXPERIENCED TWISTING/KINKING FOLLOWING DEPLOYMENT. A CATHETER WAS USED TO OPEN THE PINCH POINT AS A MEDICAL INTERVENTION. THE SUBJECT FLOW DIVERTER DID FULLY APPOSE AGAINST THE VESSEL WALLS AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE. BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY WAS USED POST SUBJECT STENT DEPLOYMENT. THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20438791 ↗

Other Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices

All Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page