Skip to content

Quadra H femoral stems 01.12.024Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · QUADRA Stem Standard HAP 12/14 S.4 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Quadra H femoral stems (32)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Medacta Quadra H hip stem is a cemented implant used in hip replacement. Reports mostly describe loosening where the stem did not stay fixed to bone, often leading to revision surgery, with some mentioning infection and pain. There are 25 reports that name its identifier, with no deaths and 24 injuries. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
25
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
24
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 25 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030802058), received between Nov 30, 2017 and Dec 24, 2025 — classified as 24 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (6 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K082792, K250450); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loose or Intermittent Connection6
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available5
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth4
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Osseointegration Problem3
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Device Slipped1
  • Failure to Osseointegrate1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration7
  • Joint Disorder5
  • Unspecified Infection5
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Pain2
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Fall1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 25 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 24, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT HAD HIP PAIN AND INFECTION. THE X-RAY SUGGESTED SEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE STEM. AT ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST PRIMARY REVISION PERFORMED AND THE STEM WAS REMOVED WITH VERY MINIMAL EFFORT.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 23886575 ↗
  • InjuryApr 29, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    REVISION OF STEM DUE TO LOOSENING. DATE OF PRIMARY IS UNKNOWN. NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 21928712 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 19, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    THE PATIENT HAS MODERATE PAIN AND PRESENTS SIGNS OF LOOSENING/STRESS SHIELDING. NO REVISION SURGERY IS PLANNED.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 21640391 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 12, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    AT ABOUT 9 YEARS 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT HAS BEEN REVISED BECAUSE OF ACETABULAR SHELL AND CEMENTLESS STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY ALL THE COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 21364654 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AT 13 YEARS 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND THE SURGEON DETERMINED THAT THE STEM MAY BE LOOSE. DURING THE SURGERY, THE STEM APPEARED TO BE WELL FIXED BUT NEEDED PROXIMAL BONE GRAFT. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 15112217 ↗
  • InjuryJun 2, 2022Fracture; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    DURING THE PRIMARY SURGERY, ON (B)(6) 2012, THE PATIENT SUSTAINED A PROXIMAL FEMORAL FRACTURE WHICH REQUIRED A PLATE 1-DAY POST-OP. PRESENTLY ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT HAD A FALL CAUSING A PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE OF THE PELVIS WHICH RESULTED IN THE LOOSENING OF THE CUP. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE FEMORAL HEAD AND CUP WITH A COMPETITOR DUAL MOBILITY CUP. THE STEM WAS WELL FIXED AND WAS LEFT IN SITU.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 14574005 ↗
  • InjuryMar 16, 2022Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 4 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE STEM. HEAD AND STEM REVISED.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 13790632 ↗
  • InjuryNov 7, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 3 YEARS 8 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY DUE TO STEM LOOSENING. STEM AND HEAD SUCCESSFULLY REVISED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12759289 ↗
  • InjuryMar 31, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    LOOSENING OF A QUADRA-H (4 STD) STEM AFTER 14 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND INLAY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 11593997 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 5, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    REVISION SURGERY ABOUT 10 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY FOR STEM LOOSENING AND HIGH LEVEL OF SUSPICION OF CUP LOOSENING WITH ECCENTRIC POLYETHYLENE ABRASION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11284531 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO THE HOSPITAL CLINIC WITH FEVER, 11 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. INFECTION OF THE HIP WAS FOUND. ALSO SHOULDER (COMPETITOR PRODUCT) WAS FOUND INFECTED. WASH OUT PERFORMED AND LINER AND HEAD REPLACEMENT. ALSO SHOULDER WASHED OUT AND REPLACED. PRIMARY IMPLANTS WERE WELL FIXED AND STABLE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 11138880 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT HAS PAIN ON THE FEMUR SIDE AND THE SPECT-CT SHOWS RED COLOURS ON THE FEMORAL STEM. THE PATIENT HAS AN ALLERGY OF TITANIUM, REASON WHY THE SURGEON MUST REVISE THE ALL PROSTHESIS. SAMPLES TAKEN DURING THE REVISION SURGERY SHOWED AN INFECTION. THE REVISION SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10167002 ↗
  • InjuryMay 26, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF A QUADRA H STEM AFTER 6 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY. THE STEM, HEAD AND INSERT WERE CHANGED.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 10086354 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    INFORMATION RECEIVED FORM (B)(6) ON 16.07.2020; REVISION PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ACETABULAR COMPONENT WAS MALPOSITIONED CAUSING POSTERIOR SUBLUXATION. THE CUP WAS WELL FIXED & REMOVED. ANALYSIS OF THE PHOTO OF THE EXPLANT RECEIVED PERFORMED BY MEDACTA RND DEPARTMENT: FROM THE RECEIVED PHOTO IT IS POSSIBLE TO NOTE THE WEAR OF THE CERAMIC LINER AND SHELL IN THE RIM, DUE TO A CONTINUOUS IMPINGEMENT. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE WITH CERTAINTY THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE EVENT, BUT FROM THE RECEIVED INFORMATION THE SURGEON DECLARED THAT THE ACETABULAR COMPONENT WAS MALPOSITIONED.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 9994547 ↗
  • InjuryDec 2, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    ABOUT 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY REVISION SURGERY FOR INFECTION. ALL HARDWARE REVISED AND A SPACER IMPLANTED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9393532 ↗
  • InjuryJul 11, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information

    ABOUT 8 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY REVISION SURGERY FOR STEM ASEPTIC LOOSENING. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE STEM AND HEAD.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8780215 ↗
  • InjuryJun 27, 2019Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED, 3 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, DUE TO STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY SWAPPING THE PATIENT STEM AND CERAMIC BALL HEAD.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 8739694 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2019Loose or Intermittent Connection

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED AFTER 2 YEARS AND 1 MONTH DUE TO STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 8734043 ↗
  • InjuryMar 13, 2019Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    3 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED FOR INFECTION ((B)(6)) LIKELY CAUSING STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8416470 ↗
  • InjuryDec 12, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO STEM LOOSENING 2 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY. THE STEM WAS LOOSE AT HIS PROXIMAL PART, THE DISTAL PART WAS WELL INTEGRATED.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 8155014 ↗
  • InjuryNov 27, 2018Naturally Worn

    ON (B)(6) 2018 WE WERE INFORMED THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DAY THE SURGEON WOULD HAVE REVISED THE PATIENT MORE THAN 11 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, DUE TO SUSPECTED FEMORAL OSTEOLYSIS AND PE WEAR. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, THE HEAD AND THE LINER.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 8105808 ↗
  • InjuryJul 20, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection

    THE SURGEON TEMPLATED FOR A SIZE 4/5 QUADRA STD STEM AND BROACHED UP TO A SIZE 4 USING A STD LATERAL APPROACH SURGICAL TECHNIQUE. HE PERFORMED A TRIAL REDUCTION AND THEN DOUBLE CHECKED THE TORSIONAL AND LINEAL STABILITY PRIOR TO CALLING FOR THE DEFINITIVE STEM. UPON IMPLANTATION OF THE SIZE 4 STEM HE FOUND IT TO SUBSIDE APPROXIMATELY 1 CM. HE THEN REMOVED THE STEM AND BROACHED UP TO A SIZE 5 AND ULTIMATELY IMPLANTED THAT STEM WHICH SAT 3MM DEEPER THAN BROACHED. THE SURGEON FELT THAT IT WAS STABLE AND ACCEPTED THE POSITION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 7706397 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 20, 2018Device Slipped

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY 7 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY: THE STEM WAS LOOSE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7281748 ↗
  • InjuryDec 19, 2017Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    PATIENT WAS COMPLAINING OF PAIN, TESTS WERE DONE TO DETERMINE THAT THE HIP HAD A STAPHYLOCCOCUS INFECTION. SURGEON DECIDED TO PERFORM STAGE ONE REVISION AND REMOVED ALL OF THE CURRENT IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7129029 ↗
  • InjuryNov 30, 2017Loose or Intermittent Connection

    REVISION DUE TO QUADRA-H ASEPTIC LOOSENING 11 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY. PATIENT HAD A FALL IN 2006 (PRIMARY SURGERY YEAR) AND THE SURGEON SUSPECTED IT MIGHT BE THE REASON FOR THE LOOSENING. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CERAMIC HEAD AND THE STEM SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 7070546 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K082792, K250450. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0791-2013 · Dec 17, 2012 · Terminated
    Medacta Quadra Trial Broach size 0 part # 01.10.10.045, for use with the Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis System. Product Usage - used to broach the intramedullary canal of the femur

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Cemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page