Skip to content

Quadra H femoral stems 01.12.031Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · QUADRA Stem Quadra Laterized HAP 12/14 S1 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Quadra H femoral stems (32)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
15
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
14
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030802133), received between Feb 2, 2018 and May 13, 2026 — classified as 14 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (4 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K082792, K250450); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 2 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loose or Intermittent Connection4
  • Osseointegration Problem4
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
  • Device Slipped2
  • Break1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Material Fragmentation1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration6
  • Joint Disorder5
  • Pain2
  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Fall1

Recent adverse event reports

The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 13, 2026Osseointegration Problem

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO QUADRA-H LAT LOOSENING ABOUT 5 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE STEM WAS EASILY REMOVED WITH FLEXIBLE OSTEOTOMES AND A FABIAN HIP REMOVAL TOOL. THE STEM APPEARED TO HAVE NO HA COATING ON REMOVAL. ONLY STEM AND HEAD REVISED, CUP AND HC PE LINER NOT REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening

    MAUDE report 25160338 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 19, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    THE PATIENT HAS SEVERE PAIN AND PRESENTS SIGNS OF LOOSENING/STRESS SHIELDING. CURRENTLY, NO REVISION SURGERY IS PLANNED.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 21640387 ↗
  • InjuryMar 19, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    DURING A FOLLOWUP VISIT THE PATIENT REPORTED SEVERE PAIN. AT ABOUT 7 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM FOR LOOSENING.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 21640386 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    REVISION SURGERY FOR STEM MOBILIZATION AT ABOUT 2 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS POST-PRIMARY. THE SURGEON ATTRIBUTES EARLY LOOSENING TO THE PATIENT BEING NON-COMPLIANT WITH POST-OPERATIVE INSTRUCTIONS AND MOBILIZING INDEPENDENTLY TOO SOON.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 21100363 ↗
  • InjuryDec 11, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Osseointegration Problem; Migration

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO LOOSE AND SUBSIDED (2.4 CM) STEM AT ABOUT 12 YEARS 4 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM WITH COMPETITOR'S USING POSTERIOR APPROACH AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 20900695 ↗
  • InjuryNov 26, 2021Break; Break

    AFTER A FALL, THE STEM NECK BROKE, 5 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO AN UNKNOWN REASON, THEN DUE TO A HIP DISLOCATION TWO CLOSE REDUCTIONS HAS BEEN PERFORMED AND ON (B)(6) 2017 THE XL HEAD WAS REPLACED WITH A 4XL HEAD (IT WAS USED A 4XL SLEEVE NOT FROM MEDACTA) DUE TO AN UNKNOWN REASON.

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 12878120 ↗
  • InjuryJul 13, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    5 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A REVISION DUE TO A MOBILIZED STEM.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 12159065 ↗
  • InjuryMar 25, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection

    4 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, REVISION SURGERY FOR LOOSE QUADRA H STEM. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE STEM AND HEAD.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 11568315 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 9, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED AFTER 6 YEARS FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE STEM.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 11300315 ↗
  • InjuryDec 2, 2019Device Slipped

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 7 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO INSTABILITY DUE TO A LOOSE STEM. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REVISE THE PATIENT, AND DURING THE REVISION SURGERY NOTICED THAT THERE WAS NO BONE GROWTH ON THE STEM. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD, AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 9394136 ↗
  • InjuryJan 9, 2019Material Fragmentation; Naturally Worn

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 13 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY DUE TO PERI-PROSTHETIC METALLOSIS ON THE PROXIMAL PART OF THE STEM AND ON THE PERIPHERY OF THE NON-MEDACTA CUP. NO INVASION OF THE JOINT CAPSULE. LINER AND HEAD WERE CERAMIC IMPLANTS. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM WITH A QUADRA R SIZE 1.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 8230879 ↗
  • InjuryNov 22, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 6 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY DUE TO STEM LOOSENING. STEM AND HEAD WERE REVISED, SURGERY COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 8098806 ↗
  • InjuryJul 13, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection

    REVISION SURGERY 6 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY DUE TO STEM LOOSENED OVER TIME: THE SIZE 1 LAT QUADRA-H WAS REVISED WITH A SIZE 3 QUADRA-H LAT. THIS REVISION WAS NOT DUE TO ANY ISSUES WITH THE IMPLANT ITSELF. THE OUTCOME OF THE CASE WAS POSITIVE.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7685639 ↗
  • InjuryMar 29, 2018Device Slipped

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO STEM LOOSENING. QUADRA-H WAS REPLACED WITH A QUADRA-C.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7380961 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 2, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection

    ONE YEAR AND 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY THE PATIENT WAS REVISED FOR A STEM LOOSENING. THE STEM WAS SWAPPED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7237241 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K082792, K250450. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0791-2013 · Dec 17, 2012 · Terminated
    Medacta Quadra Trial Broach size 0 part # 01.10.10.045, for use with the Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis System. Product Usage - used to broach the intramedullary canal of the femur

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Cemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page