Quadra H femoral stems 01.12.035Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · QUADRA Stem Quadra Laterized HAP 12/14 S5 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Quadra H femoral stems (32)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 14
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 13
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 14 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030802171), received between Sep 7, 2017 and Sep 1, 2026 — classified as 13 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (6 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K082792, K250450); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loose or Intermittent Connection6
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
- Osseointegration Problem2
- Break1
- Device Slipped1
- Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem1
- Migration1
Patient problems
- Joint Disorder4
- Inadequate Osseointegration2
- Pain2
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Aseptic loosening1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Insufficient Information1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 14 most recent of 14 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 1, 2026Osseointegration Problem
Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 50543257 ↗InjuryFeb 24, 2023Migration; Migration
ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY HIP SURGERY AFTER A FALL AND CONSEQUENT FEMORAL BONE FRACTURE. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING A JOINT LUXATION. THE SURGEON NOTICED THAT THE STEM APPEARED TO BE UNDERSIZED AND HAD SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDENCE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY REVISING THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD TO A COMPETITOR STEM AND HEAD, AND REVISING THE MEDACTA CUP AND LINER WITH A NEW MEDACTA CUP AND LINER.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 16435302 ↗MalfunctionJun 24, 2022Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem
DURING SURGERY A QUADRA-H SIZE 5 (REF. 01.12.035, LOT 152232B) WAS OPENED AND IN THE PACKAGE THERE WAS A QUADRA-S SIZE 5 (REF. 01.12.015, LOT 101086A). A BACK-UP QUADRA-H WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14797399 ↗InjurySep 28, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
10 YEARS 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO STEM LOOSENING. STEM, HEAD AND LINER SUCCESSFULLY REVISED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12539777 ↗InjuryOct 27, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection
REVISION SURGERY 6 YEARS AND 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY FOR FEMORAL STEM LOOSENING. STEM AND HEAD REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 10741394 ↗InjuryAug 11, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
1 YEAR AND 10 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, REVISION SURGERY FOR SUSPECTED LOOSENING OF THE STEM. STEM, HEAD AND LINER REVISED SUCCESSFULLY. THE STEM COME OUT EASILY, SO THE LOOSENING IS CONFIRMED.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 10389665 ↗InjuryJul 23, 2020Break; Break
IMPLANT NECK BREAKAGE, PRIMARY SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2016. REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020 (3 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY). THE PATIENT HAD MULTIPLE REVISION SURGERIES DUE TO INFECTION, IN 2017 AND 2019. IN THOSE REVISIONS SURGERIES, THE HEAD AND THE LINER WERE REPLACED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 10313460 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
6 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE SURGEON SAW OSTEOLYSIS AROUND THE STEM AND THE PATIENT HAD SOME PAIN. THE SURGEON DECIDES TO REMOVE THE IMPLANTS AND TAKES THE LIQUID FOR ANALYSIS TO CONFIRM IF THERE WAS AN INFECTION(RESULTS OF THE TEST NOT AVAILABLE).
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 10282569 ↗InjuryApr 17, 2019Loose or Intermittent Connection
ON MARCH 18 WE WERE INFORMED ABOUT A REVISION SURGERY PLANNED ON MARCH 19. REVISION PERFORMED 4 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY DUE TO LEFT SIDE STEM LOOSENING. THE REASON OF THE MOBILIZATION IS UNKNOWN. THE REVISION SURGERY COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 8522865 ↗InjuryOct 19, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT FOR STEM MOBILIZATION. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 7984648 ↗InjurySep 20, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection
ABOUT 3 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT FOR STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7893358 ↗InjurySep 19, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection
ON AUG 20, 2018 WE WERE INFORMED THAT THE PATIENT NEEDED A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO LOOSENING OF FEMUR PROSTHESIS DETECTED THROUGH BONE SCAN 5 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY; RADIOLUCENT LINES WERE FOUND AROUND THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE STEM. PATIENT HAD PAIN. ON (B)(6) 2018 THE SURGEON REVISED THE MPACT FLAT PE HC LINER 36/F (01.32.3648HCT), QUADRA LAT S5 STEM (01.12.035) AND 36M CERAMIC HEAD (38.49.7179.285.00) WITH ZIMMER REVISION STEM AND HEAD. THE SURGEON CHANGED THE LINER TO HAVE A TOTAL NEW BEARING SURFACE AND ARTICULATION. CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7888914 ↗InjuryJun 21, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN 8 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. INTRAOPERATIVELY THE SURGEON DETERMINED THAT THE STEM WAS LOOSE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM, ALONG WITH THE OTHER COMPANY'S CUP, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7624916 ↗InjurySep 7, 2017Device Slipped
THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF PAIN. THE SURGEON SUSPECTED IT WAS LOOSE. INTRA-OPERATIVELY IT WAS CONCLUDED THE STEM WAS LOOSE AND IT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder; Pain
MAUDE report 6847620 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K082792, K250450. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0791-2013 · Dec 17, 2012 · TerminatedMedacta Quadra Trial Broach size 0 part # 01.10.10.045, for use with the Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis System. Product Usage - used to broach the intramedullary canal of the femur
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Cemented devices
- NA 1365-51-000Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented753 reports
- NA 1365-50-000Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented412 reports
- ARTICUL/EZE 1365-21-000Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented1 recall280 reports
- ARTICUL/EZE 1365-11-000Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented1 death262 reports
- LFIT 6260-9-236Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented256 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented2 deaths239 reports
- ELEOS™ 25002111EOnkos Surgical, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented3 deaths230 reports
- Novation 130-36-52Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Cemented2 recalls124 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page