AMIStem H Femoral Stems 01.18.134Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · AMIStem-H Std. # 4 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AMIStem H Femoral Stems (20)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Medacta AMIStem-H femoral stem is an uncemented metal hip implant. Most of the 72 reports describe the stem loosening or shifting in the bone many years after implantation, leading to pain and revision surgery, along with bone not growing into the implant, joint problems, and some infections and fractures. No deaths were reported, and all 72 reports involved injuries. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 72
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 72
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 72 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030804106), received between Jul 19, 2017 and Dec 20, 2025 — classified as 72 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (14 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K093944, K250450); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loose or Intermittent Connection14
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available12
- Osseointegration Problem12
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem7
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth5
- Failure to Osseointegrate3
- Fracture3
- Loss of Osseointegration3
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration20
- Joint Disorder14
- Pain9
- Unspecified Infection8
- Bone Fracture(s)6
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available3
- Hip Fracture3
- Implant Pain3
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 72 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 20, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME HAD PAIN AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 11 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD AND STEM TO A COMPETITOR HEAD AND STEM AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER TO A MEDACTA LINER. NO SIGNS OF TRAUMA AND STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 23858470 ↗InjuryDec 20, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING PAIN AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE LINER, THE HEAD AND THE STEM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 23858469 ↗InjuryNov 26, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 8 YEARS 11 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A POTTED STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD, AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 23655150 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 12 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND CUP AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED ALL COMPONENTS AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 22026166 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 8 YEARS FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 21206283 ↗InjuryDec 11, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
AT ABOUT 9 YEARS FROM THE PRIMARY THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN, DUE TO A LOOSE STEM. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 20900785 ↗InjuryNov 13, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
REVISION AT ABOUT 12 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST-PRIMARY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, THE HEAD AND THE LINER SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 20673931 ↗InjuryOct 9, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE PATIENT HAD PAIN AND THE SURGEON NOTICED RADIOLUCENCY AROUND STEM COMPONENT. AT ABOUT 8 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGEON TOKE 15 MINUTES TO REMOVE THE STEM FROM THE FEMUR. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 20406386 ↗InjurySep 2, 2024Migration; Migration
AT 9 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A SUBSIDED STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 20117924 ↗InjuryMay 13, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT 9 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A POTTED STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE POTTED STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 19297225 ↗InjuryFeb 7, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 9 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD, AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 18657174 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
REVISION SURGERY DUE TO LOOSE STEM, AT ABOUT 7 YEARS 11 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. STEM, HEAD AND LINER REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 18502389 ↗InjuryJan 8, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A POTTED STEM. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD WITH A COMPETITOR'S PRODUCT AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH ANOTHER MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 18465009 ↗InjuryOct 26, 2023Migration; Migration
REVISION SURGERY AT 8 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST PRIMARY DUE TO STEM SUBSIDENCE. STEM AND HEAD REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18009786 ↗InjuryAug 23, 2023No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event
REVISION SURGERY FOR PERI PROSTHETIC FRACTURE AT ABOUT 11 YEAR AND 6 MONTHS POST PRIMARY. THE REASON OF BONE FRACTURE IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 17602730 ↗InjuryJul 25, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
AT 9 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A POTTED STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 17387719 ↗InjuryJul 20, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
REVISION SURGERY AT ABOUT 7 YEARS 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO STRESS SHIELDING AND PROXIMAL STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGERY HAS BEEN COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY BY USING A QUADRA H.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 17361808 ↗InjuryJul 14, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 8 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH A COMPETITOR STEM AND HEAD AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 17325446 ↗InjuryJun 13, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
AT ABOUT 5 YEARS 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A POTTED STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 17116001 ↗InjuryMay 31, 2023Migration; Migration
POST-OP X-RAYS REVEALED RADIOLUCENT LINES AND STEM SINKING, MORE THAN 2 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY. THE BONE ABOVE THE LESSER TROCHANTER IS MISSING. THE SURGEON IS EVALUATING A POSSIBLE REVISION SURGERY.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 17029861 ↗InjurySep 21, 2022Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME FOR A POST-OP APPOINTMENT AND IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE STEM NEVER OSSEOINTEGRATED AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD, AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 15461311 ↗InjuryAug 19, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Positioning Problem; Osseointegration Problem; Positioning Problem
AT ABOUT 4 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED AND THE STEM WAS FOUND LOOSE WHILE CUP WAS MALSEATED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 15259348 ↗InjuryMay 24, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A DISTALLY POTTED STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD, AND LINER 6 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 14488553 ↗InjuryDec 23, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
AT 7 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT HAD REVISION SURGERY DUE TO STEM MOBILIZATION.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 13078016 ↗InjuryNov 24, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 3 YEARS 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO STEM LOOSENING.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 12868989 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K093944, K250450. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0791-2013 · Dec 17, 2012 · TerminatedMedacta Quadra Trial Broach size 0 part # 01.10.10.045, for use with the Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis System. Product Usage - used to broach the intramedullary canal of the femur
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page