AMIStem H Femoral Stems 01.18.135Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · AMIStem-H Std. # 5 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AMIStem H Femoral Stems (20)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Medacta AMIStem-H femoral stem is the metal implant used in hip replacement surgery. Most of the 57 reports describe a stem that later loosened or stopped bonding with the bone, leading to pain and revision surgery years after the original operation; a few mention hip or bone fractures and one infection. Reports describe 1 death and 55 injuries. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 57
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 55
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 57 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030804113), received between Sep 20, 2017 and Jul 6, 2026 — classified as 1 death, 55 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (22 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K093944, K250450); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loose or Intermittent Connection22
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available10
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth6
- Osseointegration Problem6
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
- Fracture4
- Failure to Osseointegrate3
- Device Slipped2
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration18
- Joint Disorder17
- Pain12
- Hip Fracture4
- Implant Pain3
- Bone Fracture(s)2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Aseptic loosening1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 57 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 6, 2026Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 11 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS NO INDICATIONS OF TRAUMA. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD TO A COMPETITOR STEM AND HEAD AND REVISED THE 36/F MPACT FLAT LINER TO A FACE CHANGING 10° PE HC LINER D 40/F. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Implant Pain; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 25714734 ↗InjuryMar 31, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 12 YEARS 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 21729099 ↗InjuryFeb 5, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
AT ABOUT 9 YEAR AND 1 MONTH FROM PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD, AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 21313022 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
AT ABOUT 10 YEARS 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH A COMPETITOR STEM AND HEAD AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 19749116 ↗InjuryJan 9, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
REVISION SURGERY DUE TO POTTED STEM, AT ABOUT 7 YEARS 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY. STEM, BALL HEAD AND LINER REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 18474129 ↗InjuryDec 28, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
AT ABOUT 7 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN FOR A HIP REVISION AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. IT IS PROBABLY THAT THE PATIENT CAME REPORTING PAIN.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 16061011 ↗InjuryOct 5, 2022Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 10 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT, REMOVED ALL IMPLANTS, AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 15542037 ↗InjuryJul 6, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 7 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD AND STEM WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 14929583 ↗InjuryDec 22, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT 7 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A POTTED STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE POTTED STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR PRODUCTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 13058618 ↗InjuryNov 24, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER 3 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 12867307 ↗InjurySep 29, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO STEM MOBILIZATION 7 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 12545370 ↗InjurySep 15, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. 6 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 12473082 ↗InjurySep 6, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
4 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12428026 ↗InjuryJul 9, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate
4 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM. THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 12143121 ↗InjuryJun 7, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH A COMPETITOR STEM AND HEAD AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER 4 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 11946036 ↗InjuryMar 8, 2021Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
AMISTEM-H DUE TO LOOSENING AND SUSPECTED LINER WEAR. CHANGE OF STEM, HEAD AND LINER 9 YEARS AND 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY. SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS: LUPUS ERYTHEMATODES (ED 2008 UNDER METHOTREXAT).
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 11436147 ↗InjuryFeb 11, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY 10 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO THE STEM LOOSENING. STEM AND CERAMIC HEAD WERE REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 11313715 ↗InjuryJan 13, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN CAUSED BY A LOOSE STEM, 4 YEARS 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH ANOTHER COMPANY'S PRODUCT AND THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 11162447 ↗InjuryDec 22, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED 5 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO AN ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE STEM.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 11053944 ↗InjuryOct 6, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A POTTED STEM. THE CAUSE OF THE POTTED STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD 4 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 10634603 ↗InjurySep 30, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED, 9 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, DUE TO STEM LOOSENING. STEM AND HEAD HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY REPLACED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 10604873 ↗InjurySep 15, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO STEM SUBSIDENCE. IT HAPPENED 2 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. REVISION SURGERY DATE UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 10534440 ↗InjuryAug 26, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM. THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND FEMORAL HEAD 4 YEARS 3 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 10452928 ↗InjuryAug 5, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM. THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD, STEM, AND LINER 4 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 10366568 ↗InjuryJul 13, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A SUBSIDED STEM. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH A COMPETITOR'S PRODUCT AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER 7 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 10263651 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K093944, K250450. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0791-2013 · Dec 17, 2012 · TerminatedMedacta Quadra Trial Broach size 0 part # 01.10.10.045, for use with the Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis System. Product Usage - used to broach the intramedullary canal of the femur
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page