Skip to content

AMIStem H Femoral Stems 01.18.141Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · AMIStem-H Lat. # 1 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AMIStem H Femoral Stems (20)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
13
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
13
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 13 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030804175), received between Dec 15, 2017 and Jun 25, 2024 — classified as 13 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (3 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K093944, K250450); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available4
  • Osseointegration Problem3
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
  • Malposition of Device2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Slipped1
  • Fracture1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration4
  • Joint Disorder3
  • Bone Fracture(s)2
  • Hip Fracture1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Osteolysis1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 13 most recent of 13 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 25, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    AT ABOUT 10 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT HAS BEEN REVISED BECAUSE OF ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE STEM. THE SURGERY HAS BEEN COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 19606725 ↗
  • InjuryNov 8, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    AT ABOUT 7 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD AND STEM WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 18092792 ↗
  • InjuryOct 14, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    AT ABOUT 10 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY, REVISION OF THE HIP STEM PERFORMED FOLLOWING THE ASEPTICAL LOOSENING OF THE STEM.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 15604261 ↗
  • InjuryJul 21, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO STEM MOBILIZATION AFTER 9 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15075386 ↗
  • InjuryDec 23, 2021Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AT 8 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. THE PATIENT HAD A FALL AROUND 2016 AND NOBODY NOTICED THAT PROBABLY HAD A FRACTURE IN THE FEMUR, WHICH MAY HAVE CAUSED THE SUBSIDENCE OF THE STEM.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 13074877 ↗
  • InjuryNov 15, 2019Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    ABOUT 6 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT HIP FOR STEM LOOSENING. STEM AND HEAD REPLACED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 9326061 ↗
  • InjuryAug 14, 2019Fracture; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REASON FOR REVISION WAS DUE TO SECONDARY FRACTURE BELOW STEM. SECONDARY FRACTURE OCCURRED 4 MONTHS AND A HALF AFTER PRIMARY (3 MONTHS AND 1 WEEK AFTER FIRST FRACTURE) THUS WE WERE ALERTED ON (B)(6) 2019 THAT THE REVISION OF STEM AND FEMORAL HEAD WOULD BE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 8893109 ↗
  • InjuryJul 11, 2019Malposition of Device; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IMMEDIATE POST-OP SURGERY X-RAYS (THE SAME DAY AS PRIMARY SURGERY) REVEALED THAT THE STEM PERFORATED THE FEMUR AND PLACED WITH A FALSE ROOT. REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED THE SAME DAY THROUGH AMIS APPROACH PERFORMED SUCCESSFULLY REPOSITIONING AND REPLACING THE STEM.

    Patient problems: Hip Fracture

    MAUDE report 8780214 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY AFTER 2 YEARS AND 1 MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY DUE TO PAIN AND INSTABILITY (RADIOLUCENCIES OF AN AMISTEM HA COATED 1 LATERALIZED CEMENTLESS WERE DETECTED). REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED IMPLANTING A QUADRA-C STEM 1 LATERALIZED + PLUG 1.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 8544517 ↗
  • InjuryJan 9, 2019Loose or Intermittent Connection

    ABOUT 6 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT HIP FOR STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 8230877 ↗
  • InjuryJun 13, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information

    ABOUT 4 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT RIGHT HIP FOR OSTEOLYSIS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 7596015 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 21, 2018Device Slipped; Malposition of Device

    ABOUT 6 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT DUE TO STEM LOOSENING AND MALPOSITIONED CUP. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7285375 ↗
  • InjuryDec 15, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ONE YEAR AND 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT FOR HIP PAIN. HEAD AND STEM SWAPPED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 7121383 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K093944, K250450. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0791-2013 · Dec 17, 2012 · Terminated
    Medacta Quadra Trial Broach size 0 part # 01.10.10.045, for use with the Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis System. Product Usage - used to broach the intramedullary canal of the femur

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page