AMIStem H Femoral Stems 01.18.147Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · AMIStem-H Lat. # 7 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AMIStem H Femoral Stems (20)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030804236), received between Feb 16, 2018 and Sep 9, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K093944, K250450); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Fracture1
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
- Osseointegration Problem1
Patient problems
- Aseptic loosening1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Hip Fracture1
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
- Joint Disorder1
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 9, 2026Osseointegration Problem
Revision surgery due to Amistem H loosening. Multiple tests for infection were performed, all of which were negative. The stem was easily removed manually by the surgeons, without the need for any extraction devices. A cemented competitor`s stem was successfully implanted.
Patient problems: Aseptic loosening
MAUDE report 50692324 ↗InjurySep 12, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT HAD A PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. THE CAUSE OF THE FRACTURE IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 10 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS POST PRIMARY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 23036834 ↗InjuryFeb 19, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
REVISION SURGERY DUE TO STEM LOOSENING, STEM AND HEAD REVISED. PRIMARY WAS PERFORMED IN (B)(6) 2012. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 9726276 ↗InjuryJun 5, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO THE MOBILIZED STEM. THE STEM AND BALL HEAD HAVE BEEN REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 8669901 ↗InjuryJun 22, 2018Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
WE WERE INFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018 THAT A PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN AND TROUBLE WALKING. THE STEM MAY HAVE SUBSIDED. THE SURGEON PLANS TO TRY A LONGER HEAD, THEN EXCHANGE STEM IF THAT DOES NOT WORK. ON (B)(6) 2018 WE WERE INFORMED THAT THE SURGEON IMPLANTED A LONGER HEAD AND AS THE STEM SUBSIDED AND SETTLED IT RETROVERTED A BIT MORE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7629555 ↗InjuryFeb 16, 2018Fracture
DURING THE STEM POSITIONING AN INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE WAS GENERATED. THE SURGEON COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY THE SURGERY PERFORMING INTRAOPERATIVELY A BONE CERCLAGE.
Patient problems: Hip Fracture
MAUDE report 7276208 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K093944, K250450. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0791-2013 · Dec 17, 2012 · TerminatedMedacta Quadra Trial Broach size 0 part # 01.10.10.045, for use with the Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis System. Product Usage - used to broach the intramedullary canal of the femur
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page