Skip to content

AMIStem H Femoral Stems 01.18.147Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · AMIStem-H Lat. # 7 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AMIStem H Femoral Stems (20)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030804236), received between Feb 16, 2018 and Sep 9, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K093944, K250450); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Fracture1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Hip Fracture1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Joint Disorder1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 9, 2026Osseointegration Problem

    Revision surgery due to Amistem H loosening. Multiple tests for infection were performed, all of which were negative. The stem was easily removed manually by the surgeons, without the need for any extraction devices. A cemented competitor`s stem was successfully implanted.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening

    MAUDE report 50692324 ↗
  • InjurySep 12, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT HAD A PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. THE CAUSE OF THE FRACTURE IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 10 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS POST PRIMARY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 23036834 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 19, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO STEM LOOSENING, STEM AND HEAD REVISED. PRIMARY WAS PERFORMED IN (B)(6) 2012. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9726276 ↗
  • InjuryJun 5, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO THE MOBILIZED STEM. THE STEM AND BALL HEAD HAVE BEEN REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 8669901 ↗
  • InjuryJun 22, 2018Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    WE WERE INFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018 THAT A PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN AND TROUBLE WALKING. THE STEM MAY HAVE SUBSIDED. THE SURGEON PLANS TO TRY A LONGER HEAD, THEN EXCHANGE STEM IF THAT DOES NOT WORK. ON (B)(6) 2018 WE WERE INFORMED THAT THE SURGEON IMPLANTED A LONGER HEAD AND AS THE STEM SUBSIDED AND SETTLED IT RETROVERTED A BIT MORE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7629555 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 16, 2018Fracture

    DURING THE STEM POSITIONING AN INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE WAS GENERATED. THE SURGEON COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY THE SURGERY PERFORMING INTRAOPERATIVELY A BONE CERCLAGE.

    Patient problems: Hip Fracture

    MAUDE report 7276208 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K093944, K250450. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0791-2013 · Dec 17, 2012 · Terminated
    Medacta Quadra Trial Broach size 0 part # 01.10.10.045, for use with the Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis System. Product Usage - used to broach the intramedullary canal of the femur

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page