Skip to content

AMIStem C Femoral Stems 01.18.151Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · AMIStem C Cemented Stem Standard Size 1 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AMIStem C Femoral Stems (16)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
9
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030804267), received between Oct 6, 2017 and Oct 15, 2025 — classified as 9 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (2 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K103189); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection2
  • Device Slipped1
  • Fracture1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Migration1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)3
  • Pain2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Joint Disorder1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 15, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    DURING A POSTOPERATIVE FOLLOW-UP EXAMINATION, X-RAY IMAGING REVEALED CORTICAL HYPERTROPHY AT THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE STEM (RIGHT SIDE). THE PATIENT REMAINS UNDER OBSERVATION. THE PRIMARY SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019 (RIGHT SIDE), (B)(6) 2019 (LEFT SIDE).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23289777 ↗
  • InjuryAug 29, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    REVISION AT ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening

    MAUDE report 22922930 ↗
  • InjuryMar 31, 2023Migration; Migration

    THE PATIENT CAME IN FOR A POST-OP APPOINTMENT AND IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CEMENTED STEM HAD SUBSIDED SLIGHTLY LEAVING THE PATIENT UNSTABLE. THE CAUSE OF THE SUBSIDED STEM IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REVISE THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 16655502 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 24, 2023Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device

    AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A SUBSIDED STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE SUBSIDED STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD, STEM, AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 16435568 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. 5 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR IMPLANTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12141632 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AFTER THE INSERTION OF THE STEM, FEMORAL PERFORATION WAS CONFIRMED ON THE FINAL CHECKING X-RAY. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO FINISH THE SURGERY WITHOUT ANY TREATMENT.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 12015241 ↗
  • InjuryNov 12, 2019Fracture

    PER OPERATIVE FRACTURE OF THE TROCHANTERIAN MASSIF WHILE USING THE GRATERS. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO DON'T REVISE ANY IMPLANTS AND USE STRAPPING FOR THE FRACTURE.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 9308987 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 23, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection

    ON (B)(6) 2018 THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN INFORMED BY THE SURGEON THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. AT THIS TIME WE DO NOT KNOW IF THE REASON OF THE REVISION SURGERY IS BONE FRACTURE OR STEM LOOSENING.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 7291629 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 23, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2018 THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN INFORMED BY THE SURGEON THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. AT THIS TIME WE DO NOT KNOW IF THE REASON OF THE REVISION SURGERY IS BONE FRACTURE OR STEM LOOSENING.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7291618 ↗
  • InjuryOct 6, 2017Device Slipped; Unstable

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE STEM WAS LOOSE. THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSENING IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM ONLY AND RE-IMPLANTED A SIZE 0 STEM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 6921409 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K103189. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0791-2013 · Dec 17, 2012 · Terminated
    Medacta Quadra Trial Broach size 0 part # 01.10.10.045, for use with the Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis System. Product Usage - used to broach the intramedullary canal of the femur

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page