AMIStem C Femoral Stems 01.18.151Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · AMIStem C Cemented Stem Standard Size 1 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AMIStem C Femoral Stems (16)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030804267), received between Oct 6, 2017 and Oct 15, 2025 — classified as 9 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (2 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K103189); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Loose or Intermittent Connection2
- Device Slipped1
- Fracture1
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
- Migration1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Bone Fracture(s)3
- Pain2
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Aseptic loosening1
- Joint Disorder1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 15, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
DURING A POSTOPERATIVE FOLLOW-UP EXAMINATION, X-RAY IMAGING REVEALED CORTICAL HYPERTROPHY AT THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE STEM (RIGHT SIDE). THE PATIENT REMAINS UNDER OBSERVATION. THE PRIMARY SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019 (RIGHT SIDE), (B)(6) 2019 (LEFT SIDE).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23289777 ↗InjuryAug 29, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
REVISION AT ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Aseptic loosening
MAUDE report 22922930 ↗InjuryMar 31, 2023Migration; Migration
THE PATIENT CAME IN FOR A POST-OP APPOINTMENT AND IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CEMENTED STEM HAD SUBSIDED SLIGHTLY LEAVING THE PATIENT UNSTABLE. THE CAUSE OF THE SUBSIDED STEM IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REVISE THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 16655502 ↗InjuryFeb 24, 2023Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device
AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A SUBSIDED STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE SUBSIDED STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD, STEM, AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 16435568 ↗InjuryJul 9, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. 5 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR IMPLANTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12141632 ↗InjuryJun 17, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AFTER THE INSERTION OF THE STEM, FEMORAL PERFORATION WAS CONFIRMED ON THE FINAL CHECKING X-RAY. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO FINISH THE SURGERY WITHOUT ANY TREATMENT.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 12015241 ↗InjuryNov 12, 2019Fracture
PER OPERATIVE FRACTURE OF THE TROCHANTERIAN MASSIF WHILE USING THE GRATERS. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO DON'T REVISE ANY IMPLANTS AND USE STRAPPING FOR THE FRACTURE.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 9308987 ↗InjuryFeb 23, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection
ON (B)(6) 2018 THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN INFORMED BY THE SURGEON THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. AT THIS TIME WE DO NOT KNOW IF THE REASON OF THE REVISION SURGERY IS BONE FRACTURE OR STEM LOOSENING.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 7291629 ↗InjuryFeb 23, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2018 THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN INFORMED BY THE SURGEON THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. AT THIS TIME WE DO NOT KNOW IF THE REASON OF THE REVISION SURGERY IS BONE FRACTURE OR STEM LOOSENING.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7291618 ↗InjuryOct 6, 2017Device Slipped; Unstable
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE STEM WAS LOOSE. THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSENING IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM ONLY AND RE-IMPLANTED A SIZE 0 STEM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 6921409 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K103189. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0791-2013 · Dec 17, 2012 · TerminatedMedacta Quadra Trial Broach size 0 part # 01.10.10.045, for use with the Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis System. Product Usage - used to broach the intramedullary canal of the femur
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page