AMIStem C Femoral Stems 01.18.155Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · AMIStem C Cemented Stem Standard Size 5 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AMIStem C Femoral Stems (16)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030804304), received between Feb 23, 2018 and Feb 26, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (2 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K103189); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
- Loose or Intermittent Connection2
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
Patient problems
- Pain3
- Bone Fracture(s)2
- Aseptic loosening1
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 26, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
AT ABOUT 6 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO PAIN AS THE RESULT OF A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM TO A COMPETITOR STEM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Aseptic loosening
MAUDE report 24454895 ↗InjuryMay 7, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
AT ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA HEAD AND STEM WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 21974795 ↗InjuryMay 9, 2023Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
DURING MANUAL ROTATION WITHOUT SUFFICIENT TRACTION DURING REDUCTION, THE HEAD HIT THE RIM OF THE CUP AND CAUSED A FRACTURE IN THE CALCAR. THE LEG POSITIONER WAS USED, BUT WHEN THE FRACTURE OCCURRED, THE ROTATION WAS DONE MANUALLY. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED BY FIXING IT WITH A NESPRON CABLE.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 16893407 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2022Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND INSTABILITY DUE TO A LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD 2 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 13440314 ↗InjurySep 8, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection
2 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH A COMPETITOR STEM AND HEAD, AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12438435 ↗InjuryFeb 23, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
ON (B)(6) 2018 THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN INFORMED BY THE SURGEON THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. AT THIS TIME WE DO NOT KNOW IF THE REASON OF THE REVISION SURGERY IS BONE FRACTURE OR STEM LOOSENING.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7291621 ↗InjuryFeb 23, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection
ON 24 JANUARY 2018 THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN INFORMED BY THE SURGEON THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. AT THIS TIME WE DO NOT KNOW IF THE REASON OF THE REVISION SURGERY IS BONE FRACTURE OR STEM LOOSENING.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 7291619 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K103189. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0791-2013 · Dec 17, 2012 · TerminatedMedacta Quadra Trial Broach size 0 part # 01.10.10.045, for use with the Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis System. Product Usage - used to broach the intramedullary canal of the femur
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page