Skip to content

AMIStem-H Proximal Coating Femoral Stems 01.18.182Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · AMIStem-H Proximal Coating Lat. #2 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AMIStem-H Proximal Coating Femoral Stems (11)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030804472), received between Mar 7, 2018 and Dec 2, 2019 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
  • Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Joint Disorder1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 2, 2019Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 1 YEAR AND 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO INSTABILITY CAUSED BY A LOOSE STEM. THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9393524 ↗
  • InjurySep 10, 2019Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    WE WERE INFORMED ON (B)(4) 2019 THAT A REVISION SURGERY, FOLLOWING A LOOSE STEM, WOULD HAVE BEEN PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019 (2 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY). THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSENING ISN'T KNOWN. SINCE THE STEM WAS CHANGED, THE SURGEON ALSO CHANGED THE HEAD AND THE INLAY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8979018 ↗
  • InjurySep 7, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection

    ON (B)(6) 2018 WE WERE INFORMED THAT THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN. THE SURGEON BELIEVES THE STEM IS LOOSE. THE SURGEON PLANS TO REVISE THE PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2018.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 7854960 ↗
  • InjuryMar 7, 2018Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    ON 06 FEBRUARY 2018 THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN INFORMED BY THE SURGEON THAT A REVISION SURGERY IS PLANNED SINCE A PATIENT CAME IN WITH A LIMB LENGTH DISCREPANCY. ON (B)(6) 2018 THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD AND REPLACED IT WITH ANOTHER COMPANY'S PRODUCT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7319830 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page