AMIStem H Collared Femoral Stems 01.18.231Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · AMIStem Collared HA coated stem Size 1 STD · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AMIStem H Collared Femoral Stems (17)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 11
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030804564), received between Sep 13, 2017 and Dec 18, 2025 — classified as 11 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Osseointegration Problem4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Fracture2
- Device Slipped1
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration4
- Joint Disorder3
- Aseptic loosening1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Hip Fracture1
- Implant Pain1
- Pain1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 18, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A POTTED STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD, STEM AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 23836919 ↗InjuryJun 13, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 10 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE STEM AND HEAD.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 19527585 ↗InjuryDec 21, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 18370902 ↗InjuryDec 1, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT ABOUT 2 YEARS 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, IT WAS DETECTED STEM LOOSENING. THE PATIENT FELT ABNORMAL FEELING. NO INFECTION REPORTED. THERE WAS NO PROBLEM AT THE TIME OF 1 YEAR AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. AT THE BEGINNING THE REVISION SURGERY DID NOT SEEM NECESSARY, BUT EVENTUALLY THE STEM AND HEAD WERE REPLACED SUCCESSFULLY WITH COMPETITOR'S IMPLANTS.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 15893452 ↗InjurySep 30, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 3 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 15518382 ↗InjuryNov 22, 2021Fracture
ABOUT 1 WEEK AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON NOTICED ON THE X-RAY THAT A GREATER TROCHANTERIC FRACTURE IS VISIBLE, AND PERFORMED OSTEOSYNTHESIS USING A PLATE AND WIRE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE CAUSE OF THE FRACTURE IS UNKNOWN, BUT IT MAY HAVE OCCURRED DURING EXTERNAL ROTATION OF THE FEMUR OR WHEN USING A STARTER REAMER OR RASP. THE BONE QUALITY WAS NOT GOOD.
Patient problems: Hip Fracture
MAUDE report 12852043 ↗InjuryDec 12, 2018Fracture
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO BONE FRACTURE 10 DAYS AFTER PRIMARY. THE PATIENT DIDN'T REPORT ABOUT ANY TRAUMA. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON, THE FRACTURE COULD HAVE BEEN ORIGINATED BY THE IMPLANTED PROSTHESIS. THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2018 WITH A CORAIL STEM END ZIMMER STRAPPING CABLES.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 8155023 ↗InjurySep 20, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION. THE PATIENT WAS POSITIVE FOR AN INFECTION. THE PATHOGEN WILL NOT BE DISCLOSED. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL MEDACTA HARDWARE AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ON 01 DECEMBER 2017 WE WERE INFORMED BY THE COMPLAINER THAT THE SECOND STEP OF THE SURGERY HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THE SURGEON REVISED THE ABX SPACER AND IMPLANTED PERMANENT PRODUCT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY ON (B)(6) 2017.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 6878304 ↗InjurySep 20, 2017Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
POST-OP THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE LEG LENGTH WAS OFF. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 6878297 ↗InjurySep 13, 2017Loose or Intermittent Connection
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE STEM WAS LOOSE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 6860921 ↗InjurySep 13, 2017Device Slipped
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE STEM WAS LOOSE. THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSENING IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 6860920 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page