AMIStem H Collared Femoral Stems 01.18.232Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · AMIStem Collared HA coated stem Size 2 STD · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AMIStem H Collared Femoral Stems (17)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 15
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 15
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030804571), received between Aug 25, 2017 and May 13, 2026 — classified as 15 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Osseointegration Problem4
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
- Fitting Problem1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant3
- Inadequate Osseointegration3
- Joint Disorder3
- Pain3
- Aseptic loosening1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Hip Fracture1
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 13, 2026Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 7 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA STEM AND HEAD TO COMPETITOR DEVICES AND REPLACED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A SAME-SIZE LINER.THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO REPORTS OF TRAUMA.
Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 25160336 ↗InjuryMay 5, 2022Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER ALMOST 6 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 14287036 ↗InjuryApr 26, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT 5 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED ALL MEDACTA COMPONENTS AND REVISED THEM WITH COMPETITOR COMPONENTS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 14207976 ↗InjuryJul 26, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
4 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE FEMORAL STEM. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 12223902 ↗InjuryJun 7, 2021Fracture; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE 2 WEEKS AFTER SURGERY. THE SURGEON CABLED THE FRACTURE AND REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Hip Fracture
MAUDE report 11946671 ↗InjuryFeb 19, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A SUBSIDED STEM 4 YEARS 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY. THE CAUSE OF THE SUBSIDED STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR PRODUCTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 11347288 ↗InjuryFeb 8, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AFTER 5 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD WITH COMPETITOR PRODUCTS AND REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 11292059 ↗InjurySep 3, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM. THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD (4 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY) AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 10487272 ↗InjuryOct 23, 2019Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
THE PATIENT CAME IN, ABOUT THREE YEARS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, COMPLAINING OF PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE FEMORAL STEM. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 9222732 ↗InjuryJan 4, 2019Problem with Sterilization
DURING THE PRIMARY HIP SURGERY, THE SCRUB TECH NOTICED THAT THE STEM PACKAGING WAS COMPROMISED. SECONDARY BLISTER TYVEK PEALED BACK ON THE CORNER. THE SURGEON USED ANOTHER STEM TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AND WITHOUT DELAY. THE PACKAGING WAS DISCARDED AFTER SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8217192 ↗InjuryOct 31, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON THE SAME DAY OF THE PRIMARY DUE TO BONE FRACTURE DISCOVERED ON THE POST-OP XRAYS. NO IMPLANT WAS REMOVED, THE FRACTURE WAS CABLED.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 8023977 ↗InjurySep 12, 2018Fitting Problem
ABOUT 4 YEARS AND A HALF AFTER PRIMARY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT FOR STEM POTTING. STEM, HEAD AND LINER SWAP PERFORMED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 7868587 ↗InjuryAug 30, 2018Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
REVISION SURGERY DUE TO STEM LOOSENING 10 DAYS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON REVISED STEM, CUP, HEAD AND LINER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 7832923 ↗InjuryApr 19, 2018Device Operates Differently Than Expected
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN 1 YEAR AND 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY. THE STEM POTTED. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD WITH ANOTHER COMPANY'S PRODUCT, THE LINER WITH A MEDACTA LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7442496 ↗InjuryAug 25, 2017Unstable
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY. THERE WAS NO BONE GROWTH ON THE IMPLANT WHICH CAUSED THE INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. X-RAYS ARE AVAILABLE. EXPLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 6819951 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page