AMIStem H Collared Femoral Stems 01.18.233Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · AMIStem Collared HA coated stem Size 3 STD · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AMIStem H Collared Femoral Stems (17)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 15
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 15
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030804588), received between Oct 31, 2017 and Jan 16, 2025 — classified as 15 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available4
- Osseointegration Problem4
- Loose or Intermittent Connection2
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
- Failure to Osseointegrate1
- Fracture1
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
- Migration1
Patient problems
- Joint Disorder5
- Inadequate Osseointegration4
- Implant Pain2
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- No Code Available1
- Pain1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 16, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
PRIMARY SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2016, PATIENT FALL ON 2022, PAIN WORSENED ON (B)(6) 2024. ON RADIOGRAPHY STEM LOOSENING AND SUBSIDENCE CONFIRMED. ON (B)(6) 2024, ABOUT 8 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 21168800 ↗InjuryMar 27, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
AT 8 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A DISTALLY POTTED STEM AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD, AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 18984914 ↗InjuryJan 16, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 8 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 18516285 ↗InjuryOct 13, 2023Migration; Migration
AT ABOUT 5 YEARS 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A SUBSIDED STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE SUBSIDED STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD AND SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 17929342 ↗InjuryAug 31, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
REVISION SURGERY AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS POST PRIMARY FOR STEM POTTING. THE STEM POTTING REASON IS UNKNOWN. STEM, HEAD, AND LINER REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 15326886 ↗InjuryJan 31, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT 7 YEARS AND 1 MONTH FROM PRIMARY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A REVISION SURGERY FOR STEM LOOSENING. STEM, HEAD AND LINER REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 13392086 ↗InjuryNov 11, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN, THE CAUSE OF THE PAIN IS UNKNOWN, 2 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL REVISED ALL COMPONENTS AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 10822489 ↗InjuryJul 7, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 1 YEAR AND 10 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY FOR STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10239483 ↗InjuryOct 9, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED AFTER 1 YEAR AND 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO PAIN. AFTER EXAMINING X-RAY, THE SURGEON DETERMINED IT WAS MOST LIKELY A LOOSE STEM SO HE DECIDED TO REVISE. THE STEM AND THE HEAD HAVE BEEN REVISED. THE STEM MAY HAVE HAD MICRO MOVEMENT BUT WAS STILL FIXED FIRMLY DISTALLY AND IT WAS REMOVED WITH GREAT DIFFICULTY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 9171455 ↗InjuryJul 25, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED AFTER 1 YEAR AND 10 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY DUE TO PAIN CAUSED BY MOBILIZED STEM. THE STEM MOBILIZATION CAUSED INSTABILITY WHAT CAUSED THAT THE PATIENT FALL AND FRACTURED THE FEMUR. THE STEM HAS BEEN REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 8825503 ↗InjuryDec 18, 2018Fracture
AFTER THE SURGERY THE SURGEON DETECTED A DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURE. THE SAME DAY THE PATIENT WAS REOPERATED AND THE STEM WAS REPLACED SUCCESSFULLY USING A COMPETITOR DEVICE; THE FEMUR WAS CABLED. THE PRIMARY SURGERY HAD BEEN NORMALLY CARRIED OUT UNTIL THE USE OF SIZE 3 BROACH, WHICH STOOD PROUD; THE SURGEON DECIDED TO USE FLEXIBLE REAMERS THEN BROACH 2 THEN BROACH 3 UNTIL THE CALCAR OF THE FEMUR SIZE WAS REACHED. AT THIS STAGE HE PERFORMED AN RX AND EVERYTHING WAS OK, WITHOUT ANY SIGN OF FRACTURE AND THE CHOICE OF IMPLANTS WAS DONE (AMISTEM-H STD 3 COLLARED). WHEN IMPLANTING THE PROSTHESIS NOTHING ABNORMAL HAPPENED AND DURING THE REDUCTION EVERYTHING WENT WELL. ONLY AT THE END OF THE RX CONTROL POST-OPERATION THE DISTAL SLIT APPEARED.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 8173612 ↗InjuryApr 26, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE PATIENT WAS (B)(6) FOR (B)(6). ALL IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED AND A SPACER WAS IMPLANTED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 7464053 ↗InjuryApr 6, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN TEN DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY. THE STEM WAS LOOSE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7402532 ↗InjuryDec 15, 2017Loose or Intermittent Connection
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THAT THE STEM WAS LOOSE. THE STEM HAD SUBSIDED OVER TIME. NO TRAUMA WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7120556 ↗InjuryOct 31, 2017Device Operates Differently Than Expected
THE STEM HAD SUBSIDED. THE CAUSE OF THE STEM SUBSIDING IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 6990608 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page