Skip to content

Double Mobility Liner 01.26.2848MRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · PE Liner 28 / DMD · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Double Mobility Liner (20)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030807237), received between Oct 31, 2017 and Dec 11, 2023 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (1 report).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K083116); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • Pain4
  • Joint Disorder2
  • No Code Available1
  • Osteolysis1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 11, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 13 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 18301138 ↗
  • InjurySep 11, 2019Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size

    THE PATIENT CAME IN, 9 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY DUE TO A LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE MEDACTA LINER AND THE COMPETITOR'S HEAD. MEDACTA CUP AND COMPETITOR'S STEM ARE STILL IMPLANTED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 8987625 ↗
  • InjuryMay 23, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY DUE TO GENERIC PAIN. THE REASON OF PAIN IS UNKNOWN. CUP AND STEM LOOKED WELL FIXED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, HEAD AND LINER SWAPPED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 8636448 ↗
  • InjuryApr 30, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information

    HIP REVISION SURGERY 10 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY. THE REASON OF REVISION IS UNKNOWN AT THE MOMENT BECAUSE WE RECEIVED DIFFERENT EVENT DESCRIPTION FROM THE AGENT AND FROM (B)(4). ONLY CUP HAS BEEN REVISED. MORE INFO WILL FOLLOW THIS CASE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8564988 ↗
  • InjuryApr 2, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY 9.5 YEARS AND A HALF AFTER PRIMARY FOR OSTEOLYSIS. THE SURGEON REVISED CUP AND LINER SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 8473652 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2018Material Deformation

    THE PATIENT COMPLAINED HIP PAIN 3 YEARS AFTER THE PREVIOUS SURGERY. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY THE LINER AND THE HEAD. A PREMATURE LINER WEAR AND DEFORMATION WAS DETECTED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 7793272 ↗
  • InjuryJan 3, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO PAIN CAUSED BY AN INFLAMMATION AROUND THE JOINT AFTER 7 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY. THE SURGEON REVISED HEAD AND LINER.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 7160295 ↗
  • InjuryOct 31, 2017Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THAT THE STEM AND CUP WERE WELL FIXED. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO DO JUST A HEAD-LINER EXCHANGE. OSTEOLYSIS WAS CONFIRMED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 6990403 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K083116. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2709-2011 · May 23, 2011 · Terminated
    Product Brand Name: Versafitcup Double Mobility Liner Inserter Product Generic Name: Versafitcup Double Mobility Liner Inserter Model Number: 01.26.10.0018 The hip prosthesis is
  • Z-0878-2013 · Jan 15, 2010 · Terminated
    Versafitcup Impacting Ring Model Number: 01.26.10.0133 (46mm), 01.26.10.0134 (48mm), 01.26.10.0135 (50mm), 01.26.10.0136 (52mm), 01.26.10.0137 (54mm), 01.26.10.0138 (56mm), 01.26.

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page