Skip to content

Double Mobility Liner 01.26.2852MRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · PE Liner 28 / DMF · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Double Mobility Liner (20)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030807336), received between Nov 22, 2017 and Feb 26, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material” (1 report).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K083116); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
  • Material Discolored1
  • Material Integrity Problem1
  • Naturally Worn1

Patient problems

  • Pain3
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Disorder1
  • Osteolysis1
  • Unequal Limb Length1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 26, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT HAD SIGNIFICANT LEG DISCREPANCY AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED HEAD AND LINER AT ABOUT 16 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY AND CHECKED THE STEM AND CUP TO ENSURE THEY WERE STABLE AND HAD NOT BECOME LOOSE. IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unequal Limb Length

    MAUDE report 24454888 ↗
  • InjuryOct 15, 2024Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO SUSPECTED PE HC LINER AND CERAMIC HEAD WEAR, AT ABOUT 14 YEARS 10 MONTHS. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20448874 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    11 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND THE CAUSE OF THE PAIN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER AND ADDED A SLEEVE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12142141 ↗
  • InjuryOct 5, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    DURING A ROUTINE FOLLOW UP VISIT, THE SURGEON NOTICED OSTEOLYSIS ON THE X-RAY 9 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7938082 ↗
  • InjuryMar 28, 2018Material Discolored; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Naturally Worn

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN AND CLICKING OF THE HIP 8 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY. UPON REMOVAL OF THE LINER THE SURGEON NOTICED A BLACK DOT ON THE OUTSIDE TOP OF THE LINER. THE VISIBLE BLACK DOT ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE LINER EXTENDED THROUGH THE ENTIRE LINER. WHEN THE SURGEON CRACKED IT OPEN, A PIECE OF IT CAME OUT. IT WAS NOT A BLOOD CLOT. THERE WAS VISIBLE WEAR AT THE APEX OF THE INSIDE OF THE LINER WHICH WAS A YELLOWISH COLOR AND THE REST OF THE LINER WAS WHITE. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED A MEDACTA LINER WITH ANOTHER COMPANY'S HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE AGENT REPORTED THAT SURGEON SAID IT SOUNDED LIKE TRUNNIONOSIS. ESPECIALLY DUE TO THE FACT THE HEAD AND STEM WERE MISMATCHED COMPANIES. NOTE: ANOTHER COMPANY'S STEM USED IN PRIMARY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 7377661 ↗
  • InjuryNov 22, 2017Device Operates Differently Than Expected

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN. THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH EARLY STAGE OSTEOLYSIS AROUND THE PROXIMAL PORTION OF THE FEMUR. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 7052727 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K083116. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2709-2011 · May 23, 2011 · Terminated
    Product Brand Name: Versafitcup Double Mobility Liner Inserter Product Generic Name: Versafitcup Double Mobility Liner Inserter Model Number: 01.26.10.0018 The hip prosthesis is
  • Z-0878-2013 · Jan 15, 2010 · Terminated
    Versafitcup Impacting Ring Model Number: 01.26.10.0133 (46mm), 01.26.10.0134 (48mm), 01.26.10.0135 (50mm), 01.26.10.0136 (52mm), 01.26.10.0137 (54mm), 01.26.10.0138 (56mm), 01.26.

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page