Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System 01.26.3239HCTRecalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Flat PE HC liner Ø 32 / C · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System (32)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 18
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 15
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 18 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030807541), received between Jul 7, 2017 and Feb 24, 2026 — classified as 15 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (8 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated8
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Difficult to Insert2
- Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
- Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem1
- Particulates1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Joint Dislocation5
- Unspecified Infection4
- Joint Disorder2
- No Patient Involvement2
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Complaint, Ill-Defined1
- No Information1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 18 most recent of 18 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 24, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AT ABOUT 2 YEARS 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING PAIN AS THE RESULT OF A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD AND LINER AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. NO TRAUMA IS REPORTED. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 24429829 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AT ABOUT 1 MONTH FROM THE PRIMARY, REVISION SURGERY DUE TO JOINT LUXATION BETWEEN LINER AND HEAD. LINER, HEAD AND CUP REVISED AND MPACT DM SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 19749504 ↗InjuryJan 16, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 8 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER THAT WAS OCCURRED WHEN EXERCISING. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 18516286 ↗InjuryDec 5, 2023Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN AND INSTABILITY DUE TO A LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY. ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 11 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD, CUP AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unequal Limb Length
MAUDE report 18266626 ↗InjuryJun 21, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PRIMARY SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. FIRST REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023 DUE TO JOINT LUXATION (MEDACTA NOT INFORMED BECAUSE THE SURGEON WAS NOT A MEDACTA CLIENT); ONLY HEAD REVISED WITH A ZIMMER XL HEAD. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE JOINT LUXATED AGAIN AND HEAD LINER AND CUP WERE REVISED WITH A DOUBLE MOBILITY SYSTEM.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 17170549 ↗InjuryJun 9, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE HEAD AND THE LINER WERE REVISED 19 DAYS AFTER PRIMARY DUE TO A SUPERFICIAL INFECTION.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 14641193 ↗InjuryFeb 11, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT, REMOVED ALL COMPONENTS, AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER 3 MONTHS AND A HALF AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 13515072 ↗InjuryAug 25, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION (PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN). THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER 4 MONTHS AND A HALF AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 12364717 ↗InjuryApr 14, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY PLANNED FOR HIP INFECTION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT 14 APRIL 2021. A LINER AND HEAD SUBSTITUTION HAVE BEEN REQUESTED BY THE HOSPITAL FOR THIS REVISION. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE HEAD TO BE REVISED IS MEDACTA PRODUCT OR NOT.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 11664354 ↗InjuryMay 19, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY HIP SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN, WHICH WAS CAUSED BY A LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY. THE SURGEON REVISED THE 32MM BIOLOX S HEAD WITH A 32MM BIOLOX M HEAD AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2020, 11 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 10069359 ↗MalfunctionMay 10, 2019Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
THE INLAY DID NOT FIT INTO THE CUP. THE SURGEON TRIED A FEW TIMES TO IMPACT IT BUT IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE. THEN HE DECIDED TO USE A NEW INLAY OF THE SAME SIZE, WHICH FITTED INTO THE CUP.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 8599634 ↗InjuryOct 31, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THAT THE PATIENT HAD DISLOCATED HER HIP (HEAD DISLOCATED FROM LINER). THE PATIENT SAID THAT SHE DID NOT FALL OR EXPERIENCE ANY TRAUMA. THE SURGEON REVISED THE 32M HEAD TO A 32L. THE LINER WAS NOT REPLACED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 8023980 ↗InjurySep 26, 2018Difficult to Insert
DURING THE LINER IMPLANTATION THE SURGEON COULDN'T COMPLETELY INSERT THE INLAY INTO THE CUP. BEFORE IMPACTION HE CHECKED THAT THE CUP WAS CLEAN AND FREE FROM ANY POSSIBLE "DISTURBING" ITEMS (LIQUIDS, PARTICLES, TISSUES), ANYWAY HE COULDN'T INSERT THE LINER. THE LINER WAS THEN REMOVED WITH A SCREW AND HE INSERTED ANOTHER LINER C, HEAD 28. THE SURGERY WAS THEN COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7909555 ↗InjuryJul 31, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THAT THE PATIENT HAD DISLOCATED. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7734730 ↗InjuryMay 25, 2018Particulates
REVISION OF BALL HEAD AND LINER 2 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY DUE TO PSOAS IMPINGEMENT. INTRAOPERATIVE CLINICAL STATUS LOOKS LIKE INFECTED, HISTOLOGY MACROPHAGE INFILTRATION, BUT THE PATHOLOGY RESULTS CAME BACK NEGATIVE (NO INFECTION). SURGEON COMMENTED THAT HE FOUND DEBRIS FROM THE INLAY DURING THE REVISION.
Patient problems: Complaint, Ill-Defined
MAUDE report 7544740 ↗MalfunctionApr 27, 2018Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
WHEN THE NURSE OPENED THE LINER BOX, SHE NOTICED A BLACK DOT ON THE IMPLANT. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO USE A BACK-UP LINER.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 7468344 ↗MalfunctionJul 13, 2017Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem
THE SURGEON AND THE SUPPORTING NURSE DETECTED THAT A SMALL POLYETHYLENE SLIVER IS STANDING AWAY FROM THE INLY AFTER OPENING THE WRAPPING. THE SURGEON DECIDED NOT TO IMPLANT THIS INLAY. HE USED A NEW INLAY OF THE SAME REFERENCE AND IMPLANTED IT WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6710269 ↗InjuryJul 7, 2017Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY. THE PATIENT DISLOCATED ANTERIORLY. THE CAUSE OF THE DISLOCATION IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, LINER AND HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. X-RAYS AND EXPLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 6692864 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page