Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System 01.26.3644HCTRecalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030807671), received between Jan 4, 2018 and May 26, 2026 — classified as 15 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryMay 26, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  REVISION SURGERY ON DUE TO HIP LUXATION AT ABOUT 3 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. LINER AND HEAD REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 25275478 ↗
• InjuryMay 28, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT THE HIP WAS REVISED THE DUE TO PAIN (REASON UNKNOWN) 13 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SHELL AND STEM WERE WELL FIXED, THE VERSAFIT LINER AND BALL HEAD WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED BY A DM CONVERTER, LINER AND A 22MM BALL HEAD. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 22094477 ↗
• InjuryJul 23, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  REVISION SURGERY FOR PAIN DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE HEAD FROM THE LINER AND THE CAUSE OF THE DISLOCATION IS UNKNOWN. ONE DAY AFTER THE PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 19806113 ↗
• InjuryMay 8, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

  AT ABOUT 8 DAYS AFTER PRIMARY, THE PATIENT HAS BEEN REVISED BECAUSE OF SURGICAL WOUND ISSUES. IN DETAILS, SEROUS SECRETIONS FROM THE WOUND WERE NOTED. MOBILE COMPONENTS OF THE PROSTHESIS HAVE BEEN REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.

  Patient problems: Medical device site infection

  MAUDE report 19266722 ↗
• InjuryAug 3, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

  REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED AT ABOUT 2 WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO HIP LUXATION. HEAD AND LINER WERE SUCCESSFULLY REVISED FOR A DOUBLE MOBILITY CONVERTER.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 15154692 ↗
• InjuryJan 28, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

  AT 1 YEAR AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE LINER AND HEAD DUE TO INFECTION. DOUBLE MOBILITY IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT PREVIOUSLY UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY 3 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE CAUSED BY A TRAUMA. ONLY STEM REVISED.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 13383495 ↗
• InjuryNov 22, 2021Fracture; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  AT 2 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE HIP OF THE PATIENT LUXATED (LINER-HEAD). THE PATIENT IS NOT HEALTHY AND LIVES IN A CARE HOME, THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND DATE OF THE LUXATION IS UNKNOWN, IT WAS NOTICED ABOUT 1 WEEK LATER AND THEREFORE THE EXACT CAUSE OF THE LUXATION IS UNKNOWN. THIS IS THE SECOND REVISION FOR THIS PATIENT. PREVIOUSLY THIS PATIENT HAS A STEM REVISION DUE TO A PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURE CAUSED BY A FALL.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 12852076 ↗
• InjurySep 7, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

  1 YEAR AND 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 12432603 ↗
• InjuryAug 3, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

  THE PATIENT HAD A WOUND THAT PURGED. 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON RINSED THE WOUND AND REVISED HEAD AND LINER. SURGERY COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 12267570 ↗
• InjuryApr 7, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

  REVISION SURGERY 8 WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO SUSPECTED INFECTION. DAIR WAS PERFORMED. THE INSERT AND HEAD WERE SUCCESSFULLY REVISED.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 11626180 ↗
• InjuryOct 27, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

  THE PATIENT CAME IN, 6 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND POLY-SWAP AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 10738979 ↗
• InjuryNov 7, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

  REVISION FOLLOWING AN INFECTION. MEDACTA LINER AND COMPETITOR'S HEAD HAVE BEEN REVISED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. PREVIOUS SURGERY DETAILS ARE UNKNOWN.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 9289625 ↗
• InjurySep 5, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

  REVISION SURGERY WHERE THE SURGEON WANTS TO CHANGE THE LINER TO A HOODED ONE. AT THE MOMENT NO MORE INFORMATIONS ARE AVAILABLE CONCERNING THE SURGERY DATE AND THE OUTCOMES.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 8964553 ↗
• InjuryOct 3, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

  THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A WASHOUT AND LINER CHANGE DUE TO INFECTION 3 WEEKS AFTER PRIMARY. PATHOGEN INVOLVED: CORYNEBACTERIUM, ENTEROCOCCUS FAECAL, STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIS.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 7929609 ↗
• InjuryJan 4, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

  REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO MULTIPLE HIP LUXATION ABOUT ONE MONTH AND HALF AFTER PRIMARY. HOODED LINER IMPLANTED.

  Patient problems: Joint Disorder

  MAUDE report 7163364 ↗