Skip to content

Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System 01.26.45.0046Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Versafitcup Metalback CC Trio Ø46 mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System (32)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
17
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
17
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 17 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030807749), received between Dec 6, 2017 and Sep 9, 2026 — classified as 17 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 2 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Osseointegration Problem6
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available4
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Failure to Osseointegrate1
  • Fracture1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Malposition of Device1

Patient problems

  • Joint Disorder4
  • Inadequate Osseointegration3
  • Insufficient Information3
  • Bone Fracture(s)2
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Granuloma1
  • Hip Fracture1
  • Implant Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 17 most recent of 17 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 9, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    At about 1 month after the primary THR (performed following a femoral fracture due to a fall), revision surgery was performed due to penetration of the acetabular cup and screws through the acetabulum observed on postoperative X-ray. The cup and screws were easily removed using forceps, without a screwdriver. Pelvic reconstruction was performed, followed by implantation of a competitor`s cemented dual-mobility cup and exchange of the Medacta femoral head. Surgery was completed successfully.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 50692321 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2025Migration; Migration

    REVISION SURGERY AT ABOUT 8 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERYBECAUSE OF DEVELOPMENT OF BONE GRANULOMA AT ACETABULUM BONE LEVEL. THE SHELL WAS MIGRATED FROM ITS ORIGINAL POSITION. THE ETIOLOGY OF THIS DEVELOPMENT IS UNKNOWN. NO INFECTION DETECTED.

    Patient problems: Granuloma

    MAUDE report 23615704 ↗
  • InjuryApr 30, 2025Naturally Worn; Osseointegration Problem; Naturally Worn; Osseointegration Problem

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ABOUT 8 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE RIGHT CUP. POLYETHYLENE LINER WEAR WAS NOTED WITH SEGMENTAL ACETABULAR DEFECT (SUPRA-ACETABULAR, POSTERIOR COLUMN, AND ILIOPUBIC BRANCH).

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 21932363 ↗
  • InjuryMar 13, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Unintended Movement; Osseointegration Problem; Unintended Movement

    AT 7 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE CUP PROTRUDED IN THE ACETABULAR WALL LEADING TO CUP DISSOCIATION FROM THE ACETABULAR BONE. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY ALL THE ACETABULAR COMPONENTS AND THE BALL HEAD.

    Patient problems: Hip Fracture

    MAUDE report 18892728 ↗
  • InjuryMar 6, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    AT ABOUT 11 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC ACETABULAR LOOSENING. PAIN DESCRIBED BY THE PATIENT. NO INFECTION. CUP, LINER, HEAD, AND SCREW SUCCESSFULLY REVISED.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 18844187 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 9, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    REVISION SURGERY FOR CUP MOBILIZATION (ASEPTIC LOOSENING) AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY. CUP, LINER AND HEAD REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16331387 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    AT ABOUT 4 YEARS 10 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE CUP AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, HEAD, AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 15832739 ↗
  • InjurySep 12, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE CUP AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE CUP IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 1 YEAR AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, HEAD, LINER, AND SCREW. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 15400678 ↗
  • InjuryMar 17, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO CUP LOOSENING. THE PRIMARY SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON 2018(PRECISE DATE IS UNKNOWN). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11505917 ↗
  • InjuryDec 4, 2020Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    2 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT RETURNED FOR REVISION SURGERY DUE TO MALPOSITIONED CUP, DETECTED DURING ROUTINE SURGERY FOLLOW UP VISIT. AMIS REVISION APPROACH WAS UTILIZED, THE CUP WAS FOUND TO BE WELL FIXED BUT GROSSLY MALPOSITIONED. CUP HAS BEEN REVISED SUCCESSFULLY, MPACT REVISION CUP USED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 10949659 ↗
  • InjuryNov 6, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    ASEPTIC CUP MOBILIZATION. THE SURGEON REVISED CUP, LINER AND HEAD 1 YEAR AND 11 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 10800548 ↗
  • InjuryJul 2, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    THE SHELL MOVED (REASON UNKNOWN ) THE SURGEON DECIDED TO CHANGE CUP, LINER AND THE HEAD 4 MONTHS AND 4 DAYS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 10223520 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 14, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 9 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO THE IMPINGEMENT BETWEEN THE CUP AND THE STEM. THE CAUSE OF THE IMPINGEMENT IS UNKNOWN. THE CUP, LINER AND BALL HEAD WERE REVISED.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 9710885 ↗
  • InjuryOct 3, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ALMOST 6 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY FOLLOWING CUP MOBILIZATION. HEAD, CUP AND LINER HAVE BEEN REVISED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 9150280 ↗
  • InjurySep 26, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 27 AUGUST 2018: PATIENT UNDERWENT PRIMARY SURGERY SUCCESSFULLY IN 2014. PATIENT RETURNED TO SURGEON THIS MONTH WITH PAIN, X-RAY SHOWED CUP HAD FLIPPED.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7909557 ↗
  • InjuryJun 21, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN 1 YEAR AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THAT THE CUP WAS LOOSE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, LINER AND HEAD. THE SURGEON USED ANOTHER COMPANY'S CUP AND LINER WITH A MEDACTA HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7624921 ↗
  • InjuryDec 6, 2017Fracture

    PATIENT RETURNED TO SURGEON FOR A CHECKED UP AND COMPLAINED OF PAIN. X-RAY REVEALED A ACETABULUM FRACTURE. SURGEON PERFORMED REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 7086821 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page