Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System 01.26.45.0046Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Versafitcup Metalback CC Trio Ø46 mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System (32)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 17
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 17
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 17 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030807749), received between Dec 6, 2017 and Sep 9, 2026 — classified as 17 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Osseointegration Problem6
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available4
- Loose or Intermittent Connection2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Failure to Osseointegrate1
- Fracture1
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
- Malposition of Device1
Patient problems
- Joint Disorder4
- Inadequate Osseointegration3
- Insufficient Information3
- Bone Fracture(s)2
- Failure of Implant1
- Granuloma1
- Hip Fracture1
- Implant Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 17 most recent of 17 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 9, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
At about 1 month after the primary THR (performed following a femoral fracture due to a fall), revision surgery was performed due to penetration of the acetabular cup and screws through the acetabulum observed on postoperative X-ray. The cup and screws were easily removed using forceps, without a screwdriver. Pelvic reconstruction was performed, followed by implantation of a competitor`s cemented dual-mobility cup and exchange of the Medacta femoral head. Surgery was completed successfully.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 50692321 ↗InjuryNov 21, 2025Migration; Migration
REVISION SURGERY AT ABOUT 8 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERYBECAUSE OF DEVELOPMENT OF BONE GRANULOMA AT ACETABULUM BONE LEVEL. THE SHELL WAS MIGRATED FROM ITS ORIGINAL POSITION. THE ETIOLOGY OF THIS DEVELOPMENT IS UNKNOWN. NO INFECTION DETECTED.
Patient problems: Granuloma
MAUDE report 23615704 ↗InjuryApr 30, 2025Naturally Worn; Osseointegration Problem; Naturally Worn; Osseointegration Problem
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ABOUT 8 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE RIGHT CUP. POLYETHYLENE LINER WEAR WAS NOTED WITH SEGMENTAL ACETABULAR DEFECT (SUPRA-ACETABULAR, POSTERIOR COLUMN, AND ILIOPUBIC BRANCH).
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 21932363 ↗InjuryMar 13, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Unintended Movement; Osseointegration Problem; Unintended Movement
AT 7 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE CUP PROTRUDED IN THE ACETABULAR WALL LEADING TO CUP DISSOCIATION FROM THE ACETABULAR BONE. THE SURGEON REVISED SUCCESSFULLY ALL THE ACETABULAR COMPONENTS AND THE BALL HEAD.
Patient problems: Hip Fracture
MAUDE report 18892728 ↗InjuryMar 6, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
AT ABOUT 11 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC ACETABULAR LOOSENING. PAIN DESCRIBED BY THE PATIENT. NO INFECTION. CUP, LINER, HEAD, AND SCREW SUCCESSFULLY REVISED.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 18844187 ↗InjuryFeb 9, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
REVISION SURGERY FOR CUP MOBILIZATION (ASEPTIC LOOSENING) AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS FROM PRIMARY. CUP, LINER AND HEAD REVISED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 16331387 ↗InjuryNov 21, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT 4 YEARS 10 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE CUP AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, HEAD, AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 15832739 ↗InjurySep 12, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE CUP AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE CUP IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 1 YEAR AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, HEAD, LINER, AND SCREW. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 15400678 ↗InjuryMar 17, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO CUP LOOSENING. THE PRIMARY SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON 2018(PRECISE DATE IS UNKNOWN). THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 11505917 ↗InjuryDec 4, 2020Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
2 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT RETURNED FOR REVISION SURGERY DUE TO MALPOSITIONED CUP, DETECTED DURING ROUTINE SURGERY FOLLOW UP VISIT. AMIS REVISION APPROACH WAS UTILIZED, THE CUP WAS FOUND TO BE WELL FIXED BUT GROSSLY MALPOSITIONED. CUP HAS BEEN REVISED SUCCESSFULLY, MPACT REVISION CUP USED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 10949659 ↗InjuryNov 6, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
ASEPTIC CUP MOBILIZATION. THE SURGEON REVISED CUP, LINER AND HEAD 1 YEAR AND 11 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 10800548 ↗InjuryJul 2, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
THE SHELL MOVED (REASON UNKNOWN ) THE SURGEON DECIDED TO CHANGE CUP, LINER AND THE HEAD 4 MONTHS AND 4 DAYS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10223520 ↗InjuryFeb 14, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED 9 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO THE IMPINGEMENT BETWEEN THE CUP AND THE STEM. THE CAUSE OF THE IMPINGEMENT IS UNKNOWN. THE CUP, LINER AND BALL HEAD WERE REVISED.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 9710885 ↗InjuryOct 3, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ALMOST 6 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY FOLLOWING CUP MOBILIZATION. HEAD, CUP AND LINER HAVE BEEN REVISED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 9150280 ↗InjurySep 26, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 27 AUGUST 2018: PATIENT UNDERWENT PRIMARY SURGERY SUCCESSFULLY IN 2014. PATIENT RETURNED TO SURGEON THIS MONTH WITH PAIN, X-RAY SHOWED CUP HAD FLIPPED.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7909557 ↗InjuryJun 21, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF PAIN 1 YEAR AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THAT THE CUP WAS LOOSE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, LINER AND HEAD. THE SURGEON USED ANOTHER COMPANY'S CUP AND LINER WITH A MEDACTA HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7624921 ↗InjuryDec 6, 2017Fracture
PATIENT RETURNED TO SURGEON FOR A CHECKED UP AND COMPLAINED OF PAIN. X-RAY REVEALED A ACETABULUM FRACTURE. SURGEON PERFORMED REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 7086821 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page