Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System 01.26.45.0058Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Versafitcup Metalback CC Trio Ø58 mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System (32)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030807800), received between Nov 10, 2017 and Dec 18, 2025 — classified as 6 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loose or Intermittent Connection2
- Break1
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Osseointegration Problem1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration2
- Joint Disorder2
- Aseptic loosening1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 18, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT ABOUT2 YEARS AND 1 MONTHFROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENTCAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TOLOOSENING OF THE ACETABULAR SHELL. THERE WAS NO LOOSENING OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND NO INFECTION. THE SURGEON REVISED CUP, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 23836925 ↗InjuryJul 28, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
ABOUT 3 WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE IMPLANTS WERE REVISED DUE TO INFECTION.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 17412886 ↗InjuryMar 15, 2022Break
THE PATIENT DIDN'T FOLLOW THE DOC'S POST-OP INSTRUCTIONS OF PARTIAL WEIGHT-BEARING. HE PUT FULL WEIGHT ON THE LEG AND THE ACETABULAR WALL BROKE (BONE), 2 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. NO DAMAGE TO THE IMPLANTS. THE FEMORAL STEM WAS TIGHT, WITH NO SIGNS OF LOOSENING. CUP, LINER, AND HEAD REVISED.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 13769971 ↗InjuryDec 12, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection; Unstable
THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO INSTABILITY 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY WHICH WAS CAUSED BY THE CUP BECOMING LOOSE INSIDE OF THE ACETABULUM. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD, CUP AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 8155037 ↗InjuryNov 30, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF DISCOMFORT. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE PATIENT HAD DISLOCATED HIS HIP, THE PATIENT WAS DISLOCATING POSTERIORLY. THE CUP WAS NOT ANTEVERTED ENOUGH. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7070539 ↗InjuryNov 10, 2017Loose or Intermittent Connection
THE DAY AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY THE HIP LUXATED: SUSPECTED ISSUE WITH THE BALL HEAD LENGTH. TWO DAYS AFTER, A REVISION WAS NEEDED AND THE REASON FOR HIP LUXATION WAS FOUND TO BE A MOBILIZED CUP. THE SURGEON REPLACED THE CUP AND THE INSERT.
Patient problems: Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 7018031 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices
- Novation 130-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls156 reports
- Novation 130-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls79 reports
- CORAIL 3L92511Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate158 reports
- Acumatch A Series 138-36-29Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate3 recalls1 report
- Novation 136-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls43 reports
- Novation 130-32-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls33 reports
- Novation 132-32-51Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls26 reports
- Novation 136-36-53Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate2 recalls22 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page