Skip to content

Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System 01.26.45.0058Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Versafitcup Metalback CC Trio Ø58 mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System (32)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030807800), received between Nov 10, 2017 and Dec 18, 2025 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loose or Intermittent Connection2
  • Break1
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Osseointegration Problem1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration2
  • Joint Disorder2
  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 18, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    AT ABOUT2 YEARS AND 1 MONTHFROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENTCAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TOLOOSENING OF THE ACETABULAR SHELL. THERE WAS NO LOOSENING OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND NO INFECTION. THE SURGEON REVISED CUP, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 23836925 ↗
  • InjuryJul 28, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    ABOUT 3 WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE IMPLANTS WERE REVISED DUE TO INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 17412886 ↗
  • InjuryMar 15, 2022Break

    THE PATIENT DIDN'T FOLLOW THE DOC'S POST-OP INSTRUCTIONS OF PARTIAL WEIGHT-BEARING. HE PUT FULL WEIGHT ON THE LEG AND THE ACETABULAR WALL BROKE (BONE), 2 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. NO DAMAGE TO THE IMPLANTS. THE FEMORAL STEM WAS TIGHT, WITH NO SIGNS OF LOOSENING. CUP, LINER, AND HEAD REVISED.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 13769971 ↗
  • InjuryDec 12, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection; Unstable

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO INSTABILITY 7 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY WHICH WAS CAUSED BY THE CUP BECOMING LOOSE INSIDE OF THE ACETABULUM. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD, CUP AND LINER AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 8155037 ↗
  • InjuryNov 30, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF DISCOMFORT. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE PATIENT HAD DISLOCATED HIS HIP, THE PATIENT WAS DISLOCATING POSTERIORLY. THE CUP WAS NOT ANTEVERTED ENOUGH. THE SURGEON REVISED THE CUP, HEAD AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7070539 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2017Loose or Intermittent Connection

    THE DAY AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY THE HIP LUXATED: SUSPECTED ISSUE WITH THE BALL HEAD LENGTH. TWO DAYS AFTER, A REVISION WAS NEEDED AND THE REASON FOR HIP LUXATION WAS FOUND TO BE A MOBILIZED CUP. THE SURGEON REPLACED THE CUP AND THE INSERT.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 7018031 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page