Skip to content

Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System 01.26.45.0060Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Versafitcup Metalback CC Trio Ø60 mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Versafitcup CC TRIO Acetabular System (32)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030807817), received between Oct 26, 2017 and Jul 1, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Joint Disorder1
  • Metal Related Pathology1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 1, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT WITH OCCASIONAL PAIN, X-RAYS SHOWED NO ISSUE. SOME TIME LATER, THE PATIENT PRESENTS WITH LUMBAR PAIN. CT SCAN PERFORMED: THE RADIOLOGIST ENLARGED THE FIELD AND FOCUSED ON THE LOWER PELVIS, REVEALING AN AREA OF PERIPROSTHETIC METALLOSIS. PUNCTURE WAS NEGATIVE, NO INFECTION, BUT BLACKISH LIQUID WAS PRESENT. ABOUT 9 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON CLEANED THE JOINT AND CHANGED THE INSERT AND THE FEMORAL HEAD. STEM AND CUP LEFT IN SITU.

    Patient problems: Metal Related Pathology

    MAUDE report 22369344 ↗
  • InjuryJul 10, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    HIP REVISION FOR INFECTION. AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 7 MONTHS FORM PRIMARY ALL IMPLANTS WERE REVISED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19711167 ↗
  • InjuryOct 26, 2017Loose or Intermittent Connection; Unstable

    THE PATIENT CAME IN COMPLAINING OF INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE CUP WAS LOOSE. THE SURGEON BELIEVES THE CAUSE MAY BE FROM THE ACETABULAR REAMING IN THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE SURGEON PLANNED TO REVISE THE CUP AND LINER. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HEAD, LINER AND CUP. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 6979321 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page